msstate7
Well-known member
Um.... what?
Ray Allen was an nba player that negotiated his own contract.
http://articles.latimes.com/1999/feb/11/sports/sp-7182
Um.... what?
Ray Allen was an nba player that negotiated his own contract.
http://articles.latimes.com/1999/feb/11/sports/sp-7182
I don't understand this reasoning. Harper holds the cards... he can tell boras to kick rocks
We don’t know they contract that he has with Harper. I can’t see him negotiating for months and just dropping him with no consequences. I know, being a Realtor, that if I negotiate for a client, they can’t drop me and go on their own without consequences to the agreement I have with them. So, who knows?
Ray Allen was an nba player that negotiated his own contract.
http://articles.latimes.com/1999/feb/11/sports/sp-7182
Why? He's going to be 34 after the season, probably would expect a boat load of money if he has a decent year and we have Riley?
Makes no sense.
Why would a player do this? They are good at baseball, not at being an agent. That's why agents exist. You hire one and they work for you. If they aren't working in your best interest, you fire them and find one who will.
Lawyers are good at reviewing and explaining the legal language of a contract, but they aren't the ones making the business decisions. They advise and you decide. I don't know the specifics of Allen's deal, but I would assume most don't have the skills to do this on their own.
Steve Phillips on twitter- A source indicates that the #Phillies believe their chances of landing Bryce Harper are remote. The obvious question is whether they would pivot to Keuchel and/or Kimbrel. My sense from our interview with Matt Klentak is that they won’t play on Keuchel and only maybe on Kimbrel.
Sounds like the Giants held another meeting with Harper yesterday...if that is the case, is there a bidding war going on between the Giants and the Dodgers...that would be awesome to see Philly have the best overall deal and still lose out. Personally, i'd rather him go to the Giants as they are nearing a rebuild, but I think where it stands now is 1. Dodgers 2. Phillies 3. Giants
I always figured everything the Dodgers have done the last 1+ year has been to get Harper in LA...which is where he wanted to be all along.
If they can come up with some sort of high AAV deal on a shorter term that lets Boras say, "Harper got the highest AAV ever and is going to bet on himself due to the crappy new financial realities of MLB", it could be a win/win.
Steve Phillips on twitter- A source indicates that the #Phillies believe their chances of landing Bryce Harper are remote. The obvious question is whether they would pivot to Keuchel and/or Kimbrel. My sense from our interview with Matt Klentak is that they won’t play on Keuchel and only maybe on Kimbrel.
I thought it was reported they withdrew their offer?
That would make their chances remote indeed.
I can't imagine they have an agreement where Harper just goes to the highest bidder with or without his consent
I always figured everything the Dodgers have done the last 1+ year has been to get Harper in LA...which is where he wanted to be all along.
If they can come up with some sort of high AAV deal on a shorter term that lets Boras say, "Harper got the highest AAV ever and is going to bet on himself due to the crappy new financial realities of MLB", it could be a win/win.
May Be something like 5 years and 140 million, but heavily front loaded with an opt after year 3 and 4. So something like 40, 35 , 35, 20, 10. Would almost guarantee Harper opts out in 3 years and also lessens the luxury tax hit.