Disclosing the materials with certain portions redacted strikes the appropriate balance between public access and prosecutors’ desire for confidentiality to protect its ongoing investigations, judge Pauley said in his February ruling.
"At this stage, wholesale disclosure of the materials would reveal the scope and direction of the government’s ongoing investigation," Pauley wrote. "It would also unveil subjects of the investigation and the potential conduct under scrutiny, the full volume and nature of the evidence gathered thus far, and the sources of information provided to the government."
I suspect even the redacted version will be of significant public interest.