TUESDAY MINORS FINAL 5/7/19: Kingham Flawless Again

smootness said:
What...the.......
Click to expand...

Watch the replay and when waters is running the bases a Braves logo swings in like they are cutting over to a replay but instead it goes right back to waters running the bases. Like why did they swing that logo in. It usually is a segway or transition. But not for milb tv. So weird. And they do that ALL the time.
 
bravesfanMatt said:
Watch the replay and when waters is running the bases a Braves logo swings in like they are cutting over to a replay but instead it goes right back to waters running the bases. Like why did they swing that logo in. It usually is a segway or transition. But not for milb tv. So weird. And they do that ALL the time.
Click to expand...

Haha no I know, that thing has always bewildered me. Was just messing with you cause that sentence makes no sense.
 
Enscheff said:
Good to see Pache making progress in areas everyone said he needed to make progress. At this point he and Waters are lining up to be serious options sometime in the middle/end of 2020.
Click to expand...

That timeline is critical. I think a lot of people are going to want to put them on the opening day roster.

I'm with you that they likely need another year. STill very young so the sample size is pretty small.
 
bravesfanMatt said:
Are you saying that to be snarky or do you know this. His control seems to be on point but not sure I like a guy not missing a lot of bats.
Click to expand...

Snarky about the entire thing - he's obviously only having success because he's competing against children.
 
clvclv said:
Snarky about the entire thing - he's obviously only having success because he's competing against children.
Click to expand...

damn dude.
no one suggests that's the only reason.
it's definitely something relevant to note, tho. it's important.
 
Super said:
damn dude.
no one suggests that's the only reason.
it's definitely something relevant to note, tho. it's important.
Click to expand...
Kingham is capable of decent strikeout numbers if that were his game and if he were consistent. Right now, it's not just age, his FB has heavy sink. Higher milb'ers would struggle to make solid contact off of him.
 
Last edited:
Deester11 said:
Kingham is capable of decent strikeout numbers if that were his game and if he were consistent. Right now, it's not just age, his FB has heavy sink. Higher milb'ers would struggle to make solid contact off of him.
Click to expand...

i know nothing about the guy honestly...just commenting on the silly reverse-hyperbole being used to try and make a point.
 
Russ2dollas said:
I keep telling myself that the braves cannot be lucky enough to have two more position guys who are able to impact at 21 after acuna. The sample size is still small.

But the scouts and the results seem to be very positive.

Starting to dream of a team where neck is our fourth of....
Click to expand...


Its kind of ironic after all the debates about pitching vs hitting prospects here we are with a great offense and **** pitching.
 
For the record, Kingham is not old for the FSL. In fact, he's about a year younger than the average player in the league at this point in the season. I'm curious to see how he does moving forward. He was better as a sophomore at the University of Texas than he was as a junior, which dinged his draft status.
 
50PoundHead said:
For the record, Kingham is not old for the FSL. In fact, he's about a year younger than the average player in the league at this point in the season. I'm curious to see how he does moving forward. He was better as a sophomore at the University of Texas than he was as a junior, which dinged his draft status.
Click to expand...

Right. The age issue isn't a problem here, despite the strange posts clvclv continues to make.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top