Sweden reporting 613 new cases (a fairly decent spike from recent days ) and 130 new deaths. The curve is not flattening in Sweden.
613 cases is evidence of the curve flattening.
Sweden reporting 613 new cases (a fairly decent spike from recent days ) and 130 new deaths. The curve is not flattening in Sweden.
613 cases is evidence of the curve flattening.
613 new cases would represent the 4th highest one day total in Sweden, and a spike from recent days.
People dying doesn't have a dramatic impact on the social/economic system in comparison to the residual impact of an overloaded hospital system.
The big fear from the CCP virus was always the hospitalization and why we NEEDED the lockdowns. Saying otherwise now is just dishonest.
Makes literally no sense to me, but whatever.
People were/are worried about hospitalization strain... because it would lead to a higher death rate. That may be in fact happening to some degree in NYC.
Again, we would expect the curve to be flattening to some degree in Sweden, right? It isn't like they are actually doing nothing. They've followed a number of the potential strategies from the IC report, as far as I can see.
Got it, we weren't actually worried about people dying. Good point.
Yeah, pretty much. All the numbers in the IMHE model are back calculated from deaths. The model at first was explicitly using the 11:1 ratio of hospitalizations from China across the board. The then adjusted it down when they had better individual state data. CA had a 10:1 ratio, for example, so there wasn't much adjustment there. NY had a much lower 4.22:1 ratio.
The likely reason for that disparity is that CA has a less stressed system and was admitting less severe cases that might not even get tested in NY, much less admitted.
That should show a reasonable person why "hospitalizations are the only important number" is a dumb thing to say.
No, no, I got. We weren't at all worried about overloaded hospitals leading to more deaths. We were only worried about the social strain and stuff.
I just can't believe how I missed it before. Thank you for your persistence in bringing these issues to light in these uncertain times.
PPP program has closed, no more money left for small businesses.
Had to give that extra money to the big dogs and a loophole to the 1% in the bill.
I wonder if New York and other states were relying on their forecasts for how many hospital beds or ventilators were needed. I hope not because it has been apparent for some time that something was wrong, badly wrong, with those forecasts. It would have been a fairly easy fix to change the multiple. An even better idea would have been to have some advance consultations with hospitals around the country about what their protocol for admitting patients would be.
PPP program has closed, no more money left for small businesses.
Had to give that extra money to the big dogs and a loophole to the 1% in the bill.
My guess is that people at the top (well maybe not de Blasio, not sure if he can even read) were probably looking at a bunch of different models, but trying to prepare for the worst numbers amongst them, just in case. But who knows. I'm not sure the hospitals could have given you a completely accurate picture of their admitting procedures before they actually got into triage mode.
I mean, for another thing, the number of people dying outside the hospitals (which is apparently a lot in NYC) doesn't really seem baked into the initial model at all. That could be messing up the ratios as well.
Sweden reporting 613 new cases (a fairly decent spike from recent days ) and 130 new deaths. The curve is not flattening in Sweden.