That's what we need to know.
The Coronavirus, not the beer
- Thread starter Runnin
- Start date
That's what we need to know.
It's not a move. It's getting new information and determining the important metrics. Keep up.
Once we found out that a huge subset of the population is essentially death risk free that changes a lot.
Stupid commentary as usual
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
[Tw]1253321483402674178[/tw]
Ugh....I want to believe this so bad. Confirmation bias raging.
Lockdowns useless....
China data
soccer games (outdoor) were major vectors in Northern italy
Yeah, I domt think anyone has said for large sporting events to start back up with crowds. Seems like a pretty easy target to mitigate.
[Tw]1253321483402674178[/tw]
Ugh....I want to believe this so bad. Confirmation bias raging.
Lockdowns useless....
China data
How is this new data? Or even relevant? Common sense tells you are more likely to get it from people you come into contact with frequently like your family, co-workers, neighbors, or school mates and not some stranger walking down the streeet.
Which would give you what conclusion on lockdowns?
That if you do get it, you are super likely to get it from people you come in contact with everyday, like your family, co-workers, neighbors, or school mates.
Unless you've reversed course and are now saying it isn't super contagious.
More time indoors with the contagion is bad.
Not sure where you are seeing that, but even if the highest estimate of 35% were true, IFR of confirmed deaths would also be nearly .4% and climbing. Considering NYC unofficial death count is nearly 15K, you are also looking at .5% death rate.
I expect lots of 'playing' with the death count.
Still doesn't change the fact that almost half the population (maybe more) does not have a .5% chance of dying from the virus.
May be we should never go indoors again. Really teach this virus who's boss.
Another pearl of wisdom.
Putting even 1/3 of the population at serious risk of hospitalization or death doesn't sound any better.
THen what is Carps plan moving forward if we can't risk anyone?