The Coronavirus, not the beer

When are we going to do some audit of the excess mortality theory?

It should be easy to track down some of these excess deaths and validate its from COVID. Why isn't that happening?
 
thethe said:
That doesn't mean that total infection rate for the region is 7% and you know that.
Click to expand...

I mean you can see the data and draw a conclusion that really 30% of the population has been infected. You can interpret the data as you wish.
 
nsacpi said:
I mean you can see the data and draw a conclusion that really 30% of the population has been infected. You can interpret the data as you wish.
Click to expand...

You can do that or you can interpret the data is the right way and saying that 7% infection rate as of that date is completely wrong.
 
thethe said:
When are we going to do some audit of the excess mortality theory?

It should be easy to track down some of these excess deaths and validate its from COVID. Why isn't that happening?
Click to expand...

I dunno. Someone will have to volunteer to dig up the corpses and administer tests. Again the data are what they are.

I'm not the one who has been arguing that lockdowns cause suicides and other forms of non-COVID deaths. Sweden has no lockdowns. And yet their excess deaths exceed their official COVID deaths by 20-30%. Keep in mind that social distancing reduces deaths from other infectious diseases like flu. So what is causing those excess deaths in Sweden? Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
 
nsacpi said:
I dunno. Someone will have to volunteer to dig up the corpses and administer tests. Again the data are what they are.

I'm not the one who has been arguing that lockdowns cause suicides and other forms of non-COVID deaths. Sweden has no lockdowns. And yet their excess deaths exceed their official COVID deaths by 20-30%. Keep in mind that social distancing reduces deaths from other infectious diseases like flu. So what is causing those excess deaths in Sweden? Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
Click to expand...

Fear of going to hospital for needed life saving procedures

I think its clear.

It should not be hard to validate excess deaths. The fact that we are still living in the theoretical world on this speaks volumes. People are either scientists or not.
 
nsacpi said:
bump...I guess source ain't important since we can take 7% and make it a different number
Click to expand...

Or you can actually do what you say and interpret the data correctly

You are willfully choosing not to do that.

Its making me wonder about your motives.

You know I am 100% right on this issue.
 
nsacpi said:
guilty as charged...I am willfully looking at 7% and saying that's the number as of late April...bad faith on my part
Click to expand...

Willfully saying 7% presence of antibodies = 7% infection rate

Glad you are admitting to your error in data analysis.
 
nsacpi said:
no I get it...a seroprevalence rate of 7% tells you 30% of the population has been infected...I totally get it now
Click to expand...

Ok - Well when you want to engage in a real conversation about why 7% antibody at a point in time doesn't equal 7% cumlative infection rate then I'll be around.

Enjoy your day and keep hoping for bad news.
 
thethe said:
Ok - Well when you want to engage in a real conversation about why 7% antibody at a point in time doesn't equal 7% cumlative infection rate then I'll be around.

Enjoy your day and keep hoping for bad news.
Click to expand...

I thought this was good news...over 30% of people in Stockholm have been infected...isn't this what you have been saying all along
 
nsacpi said:
I thought this was good news...over 30% of people in Stockholm have been infected...isn't this what you have been saying all along
Click to expand...

Well lets see.

Late April 7% means that around 7% of hte population got infected by late March or early April

What does that mean for all of April and May where they didn't have lockdown?

Hmm....
 
thethe said:
Well lets see.

Late April 7% means that around 7% of hte population got infected by late March or early April

What does that mean for all of April and May where they didn't have lockdown?

Hmm....
Click to expand...

hmmm...I think it means over 30% were infected by May
 
thethe said:
Based on confirmed case increase over the comparative period.

It just might and deep down you're aware of this fact.
Click to expand...

Yup. And when Sweden does new testing for seroprevalence at the end of this month we'll see a number north of 30%. Bookmark it Danno.
 
nsacpi said:
Yup. And when Sweden does new testing for seroprevalence at the end of this month we'll see a number north of 30%. Bookmark it Danno.
Click to expand...

Nope because at the end of this month will mean cumlative infection rate as of middle to the end of APril so it won't catch May infections.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top