2020 Field
- Thread starter sturg33
- Start date
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
malevolence tempered by incompetence--as good a summary as any that I've seen of very poorly chosen one and his administration
but we've also seen some instances of malevolence compounded by incompetence
either way he is toast and January 20 can't arrive soon enough
he's not really Hitler 2.0
he is a keystone cops version of Mussolini
but we've also seen some instances of malevolence compounded by incompetence
either way he is toast and January 20 can't arrive soon enough
he's not really Hitler 2.0
he is a keystone cops version of Mussolini
msstate7
Well-known member
Be interesting to see where the extra turnout occurs. If it's up huge in NY, CA, MS, AL, Etc (you get the point, decided states), it really makes no difference.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2020/10/23...p-won-debate-but-biden-will-win-election.html
GOP pollster Frank Lutz says even if the polls are as wrong as they were in 2016 its virtually impossible to win.
GOP pollster Frank Lutz says even if the polls are as wrong as they were in 2016 its virtually impossible to win.
Morons like you are so easily manipulated. Two left leaning members at the WSJ thinks it's a nothingbuger. Strassel and other right-wingers at the WSJ say something different. Just because you found an article by libs at the WSJ that backs up your stupidity doesn't make it a fact. However, even if the libs at the WSJ are right about Bobulinski(sp?) evidence that doesn't change what's in H. Biden's hard drive in which our DNI, DOJ, and FBI have said that it's not Russian disinformation.
Last edited:
acesfull86
Well-known member
Should be the 2nd best result for a libertarian...better than Johnson in 2012, but not quite as good as 2016.
A couple of weeks ago, Jorgensen was polling higher than the spread between Trump and Biden in 4 states. Here’s hoping she plays spoiler...I really don’t care which direction, just make an impact and piss people off.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Woah there sandy vagina. Heres a few questions for you.
1. How are these texts from May 2017 when WhatsApp stopped working on these blackberry devices in December 2016?
2. The DNI, DoJ, and FBI that you refer to are political appointees of Donald Trump weighing in on this. Its been 4 years of non stop ****ting on anyone even loosely connected to any Democrat as being biased yet we are supposed to take what Trumps political appointees say on face value? Let me guess, you dont trust any of the various people appointed by Trump who have said how incompetent and corrupt he is? William Barr might as well be Trumps personal attorney. Christopher Wray has actually shown some integrity but are you going to accept his conclusions only when they benefit the narrative you want?
3. Are you going to accept the conclusions of Biden appointed DNI, DoJ, and FBI or as I know you will are you going to whine and complain we cant believe them because they were appointed by Biden? Dont sit and use political appointees of Trump conclusions as proof of anything unless you are willing to do so for both sides.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Its going to be interesting to hear the crying from the right when world leaders start saying how they truly feel about Trump when he no longer has the power to use the federal government to retaliate against them. Netanyahoo isnt going to be one of them, but I suspect there will be quite a few. That Ukranian President's first call is gonna be super awkward. "Yeah, hi Mr. President, sorry I tried to help the previous President smear you in the election, can we still be best friends?"
57Brave
Well-known member
GOP
@GOP
Pres. Trump is fighting for YOU! Here are some of his priorities for a 2nd term:
*Establish Permanent Manned Presence on The Moon
*Send the 1st Manned Mission to Mars
*Build World’s Greatest Infrastructure System
*Establish National High-Speed Wireless Internet Network
@GOP
Pres. Trump is fighting for YOU! Here are some of his priorities for a 2nd term:
*Establish Permanent Manned Presence on The Moon
*Send the 1st Manned Mission to Mars
*Build World’s Greatest Infrastructure System
*Establish National High-Speed Wireless Internet Network
https://www.financialexpress.com/in...your-smartphone-is-on-this-list-check/989461/
"Below is the complete list of smartphones and platforms from which WhatsApp will withdraw its support:
Blackberry OS from December 31, 2017
Blackberry 10 from December 31, 2017"
WhatsApp ended support for Blackberry in December 2017, not December 2016. It was supposed to end in 2016 but it didn't. Sorry, your story doesn't add up. If I can't rely on the intel community in this instance then who do I rely upon? Left-wing journalists with an agenda like you do? As of now this does not look like Russian disinformation.
Last edited:
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
You appear to be right about the date WhatsApp stopped working on blackberry devices. I did look it up before posting and tried to verify that claim. As you point out it was scheduled to stop in 2016. Unlike a lot of people around here I dont have a problem admitting if I get something wrong. Happens to the best of us.
You are selectively accepting what you want to hear and I am not going to play that game with you. I could give you a long list of statements by Trump appointees about how corrupt and incompetent Trump is. Who are we to trust if not the intelligence people literally in the room with him? I am just searching for some consistent logic here. Should we believe these people or only when they say things convenient for Trump? Do we dismiss political appointees conclusions or only when its people appointed by a Democrat?
The Republican Senate committe exonerated the Bidens of any crimes. The highly partisan AG has not charged Hunter Biden with a crime. If you have any proof of a crime that would pass the sniff test of a Grand Jury please send it to the AG right away. Little known fact here, I would celebrate with the rest of you if Biden went to prison. I wish it was all true.
You are selectively accepting what you want to hear and I am not going to play that game with you. I could give you a long list of statements by Trump appointees about how corrupt and incompetent Trump is. Who are we to trust if not the intelligence people literally in the room with him? I am just searching for some consistent logic here. Should we believe these people or only when they say things convenient for Trump? Do we dismiss political appointees conclusions or only when its people appointed by a Democrat?
The Republican Senate committe exonerated the Bidens of any crimes. The highly partisan AG has not charged Hunter Biden with a crime. If you have any proof of a crime that would pass the sniff test of a Grand Jury please send it to the AG right away. Little known fact here, I would celebrate with the rest of you if Biden went to prison. I wish it was all true.
The problem with your view is that you have zero evidence to support that this is some kind of Russian or conservative conspiracy. Yes, Hunter was cleared because of a lack of evidence. This is new evidence and it looks damning. One of the e-mails on the drive Hunter talks about giving a certain percentage of his salary to his dad. Will Joe or Huner Biden go to jail over this? I doubt it. How often do wealthy crooks go to jail?
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
I think Giuliani and Bannon being involved is pretty good circumstantial evidence of shenanigans. Trumps own Treasury department recently put sanctions on Andrii Derkach, who Giuliani is working with, for trying to influence the election as an agent of Russia. I have never seen any plausible explanation as to why Hunter would drop off his labtop 1000 miles from his home at a blind Trump supporters repair shop and leave it. Really convenient that the shop owner cant identify who dropped it off. I would venture to guess there would be some kind of record of Hunter Biden being in Deleware around this time. Where did he stay? He doesnt have a home in Delaware as far as I know. I doubt he drove back home 1000 miles there should be airline records. The burden of proof isnt on others to prove this wrong, the proof is in the pudding and thats Hunter Biden not being arrested andcharged with any crimes by a more than willing Trump loyalist.
The email if I remember correctly says "Mr. Big" not Joe Biden and refers to a deal that is easily verifiable to have not happened. If I recall the President's impeachment lawyers "its not a crime if its not successful". Surely you see the issues with new allegations by people with no credibility like Giuliani right before an election when there is no time to resolve the matter before the election. He has allegedly had this for months but only releases it when voting starts? If its verifiable its Hunter labtop and there is child porn on there that they can verify when it was added or accessed then its a pretty simple thing, doesnt require 6 months of investigation(unless he is a cop). The burden of proof is on the people making the accusations. Like I tell little thethe with all his BS, I'll give it credibility when there is an indictment. If Loretta Lynch or a Democrat was AG I would say they may be being protected for political reasons just like I say Barr has done for Trump but this isnt the case here. The AG himself says he wont be bullied into doing or not doing something because of the optics.
The email if I remember correctly says "Mr. Big" not Joe Biden and refers to a deal that is easily verifiable to have not happened. If I recall the President's impeachment lawyers "its not a crime if its not successful". Surely you see the issues with new allegations by people with no credibility like Giuliani right before an election when there is no time to resolve the matter before the election. He has allegedly had this for months but only releases it when voting starts? If its verifiable its Hunter labtop and there is child porn on there that they can verify when it was added or accessed then its a pretty simple thing, doesnt require 6 months of investigation(unless he is a cop). The burden of proof is on the people making the accusations. Like I tell little thethe with all his BS, I'll give it credibility when there is an indictment. If Loretta Lynch or a Democrat was AG I would say they may be being protected for political reasons just like I say Barr has done for Trump but this isnt the case here. The AG himself says he wont be bullied into doing or not doing something because of the optics.