[tw]1329131695774248972[/tw]
No evidence.
No big deal.
Orange man bad.
This is also with our republican classic crowd in here as well who would rather sacrifice the integrity of our nations elections than to see trump destroy the fraudulent GOP.
Dude...if that's true then blame this guy. He should have protested the ballots right then, he should have pulled out a camera right then, he should have called the next person up the chain right then. There is no way to verify the legitimacy of ballots once they're in the count. I am aware of this, the poll workers I know are aware of this, he should be aware of this.
I agree 100% but the whole strategy from the Democrats was to comingle as many fraudalent ballots as fast as possible. Does that mean we should just sit back and accept it after we have had one of hte most successful presidencies of our lifetime?
We have to fight until we exhaust every legal avenue. The States can still not certify the vote if enough evidence is presented to them that proves the whole election process was compromised.
I'm not going to feel guilty if the house gives Trump a second term. Its the best thing for the country moving forward.
tell it to a judge...see if they buy any of it
31-1
Maybe someone wants to explain why the rejection rates of mail ins dropped so much? I’ll expect this to be ignored.
I agree 100% but the whole strategy from the Democrats was to comingle as many fraudalent ballots as fast as possible. Does that mean we should just sit back and accept it after we have had one of hte most successful presidencies of our lifetime?
We have to fight until we exhaust every legal avenue. The States can still not certify the vote if enough evidence is presented to them that proves the whole election process was compromised.
I'm not going to feel guilty if the house gives Trump a second term. Its the best thing for the country moving forward.
So nsacpi, if the Dominion stuff isn't true then why aren't they suing?
Nsacpi? Want to give this one a whirl?
How about Chop? Bedell?
No fraud in this election?
who says they arent
but they may also judge for business reasons that letting these charges die a natural death might be the best thing to do
well what is the data on the drop in rejection rates...do you have a link or source?
Here's the problem.
1.) Even if he head the best lawyers and a court as friendly as CNN pretends it is, there's nothing there for the court to do to help him. There were procedures in place for observers to follow if they saw fraud. None of them did. None. If the allegations are true, and if they had followed those procedures and then someone higher in the chain had failed to fulfill their responsibility, then a court could help.
2.) There is no chance and never was a chance that this would go to the House. Even if there had been enough clear proof in enough states to matter, it would have been handled in a way that didn't disenfranchise entire states of people. That's just a political reality, and I think you're pragmatic enough about the nation's politics to recognize it.
With the accusations made?
You know that isn't whats best for the business.
I don't believe there is a country wide but state wide in certain areas is readily accessable.
WIth the amount of research you did in other areas I have to question why you aren't concerned about this.