If they sue her, doesn't that open the software to discovery? Isn't that exactly what Trump/Powell want... well, obviously without the threat of being bankrupted.
lol no, it's not what they want. because they're lying, and they know it.
If they sue her, doesn't that open the software to discovery? Isn't that exactly what Trump/Powell want... well, obviously without the threat of being bankrupted.
Do you have a link to the NYT article about the stain on the Democratic party caused by all of the death, fire, and destruction of this Summer? My interneting skills are weak because I'm having a hard time finding it.
I do agree with you on the votes to disenfranchise entire states. It was wrong when the other guys did it, it's wrong today, and it will be wrong the next time, when the other guys do it effectively and have people refer to this as an excuse.
i missed where dem politicians, especially the top leadership, incited violence and takeover of the Capitol over a complete fabrication.
the fact you think these things are similar...fox news brain rot.
If they sue her, doesn't that open the software to discovery? Isn't that exactly what Trump/Powell want... well, obviously without the threat of being bankrupted.
Do you have a link to the NYT article about the stain on the Democratic party caused by all of the death, fire, and destruction of this Summer? My interneting skills are weak because I'm having a hard time finding it.
I do agree with you on the votes to disenfranchise entire states. It was wrong when the other guys did it, it's wrong today, and it will be wrong the next time, when the other guys do it effectively and have people refer to this as an excuse.
Ouch
[TW]1347546912325578752[/TW]
i missed where dem politicians, especially the top leadership, incited violence and takeover of the Capitol over a complete fabrication.
the fact you think these things are similar...fox news brain rot.
How does this work if she brings in other sources as evidence for her claims? Like that security company audit that supposedly showed a 63% error rate, can she reasonably point to that and sort of pass the buck?
you might find this of interest
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/30/opinion/anarchists-protests-black-lives-matter.html
It wasn't a security company audit... it was an audit done by one guy who works in security who wouldn't share his data and was a known radical right wing activist.
I wasn't trying to call it legitimate, I told thethe it wasn't. I'm asking if she can expect that to bail her out.
Nah... unless they settle (and Dominion has said they have no interest in any settlement... who knows if that is actually true), then she is screwed.
The pot of gold for Dominion would be if they can tie the defamation to the PACs that have been fundraising off of all this. It seems to me they might be able to make the case that the funds raised are ill-gotten gains that came at the expense of Dominion. Those PACs have raised a lot of dough. I'm not a lawyer, but I think they should be pursuing that type of legal theory/strategy.
If they do this, wouldn't the ones that get sued just find a way to replace dominion when they gain power again?