I mean, that's a phrase scouts consistently use, so I'm sure there's something to it. I recall hearing similar scouting takes about Ozzie coming up.
I think the take from that is that he hits the ball hard with a lot of frequency, something his hard hit% should reflect, and therefore would support a higher BABIP. Do we have those sort of numbers for minor leaguers? I haven't the faintest idea of where to look for those.
Waters' in-game power has not been at all impressive especially considering his Ks and lack of walks.
he's young and apparently has tools tho.
Do we have any idea what he did last year, or are we just extrapolating from previous years?
The Braves seem to be higher on him than you guys, so maybe they know something we don’t.
there was no last year for minor league games.
we don't have much info from the alternate site, of course, and sure maybe he improved a ton. but we have no evidence of it.
i don't think we know how much the Braves value him tho.
So now the Waters defense has turned to the always wrong “he’s so good he gets himself out” argument. That argument is used for toolsy guys who rarely pan out. This after the “he just needs to learn how to hit” defense.
You guys are literally describing every single failed toolsy OF prospect. Hopefully he improved a lot at the alternate site, even though he still wasn’t deemed as good as Pache who was nothing to brag about with the bat.
Being fair...
You're admittedly the low guy on Waters around here, so you look at the downside as much as many look at his upside. I think the majority of folks being realistic are somewhere in the middle between you and them and would be quite thrilled if he turns into a 20-ish HR, 15-ish SB offensive piece that doesn't need a platoon partner and can hold down all 3 OF spots with no worries. Somebody like that that gives you an elite defensive OF, hits toward the bottom of the lineup, and is cheap for the duration of Acuna's contract would be a pretty nice piece - especially if/when the DH resurfaces.
Most of us certainly aren't expecting him to turn into an All-Star.
The problem is you think that's realistic rather than near best case.
Being fair...
You're admittedly the low guy on Waters around here, so you look at the downside as much as many look at his upside. I think the majority of folks being realistic are somewhere in the middle between you and them and would be quite thrilled if he turns into a 20-ish HR, 15-ish SB offensive piece that doesn't need a platoon partner and can hold down all 3 OF spots with no worries. Somebody like that that gives you an elite defensive OF, hits toward the bottom of the lineup, and is cheap for the duration of Acuna's contract would be a pretty nice piece - especially if/when the DH resurfaces.
Most of us certainly aren't expecting him to turn into an All-Star.
That’s a pretty damn good player you just described. A CF capable guy with that type of power is a stud. I’m not the low man on him because I dislike him...he didn’t steal my girlfriend. I’m the low man on him because he hasn’t shown anything to suggest he’s going to be an impact player.
Waters is a good prospect. That’s what FV 50 means. I’ve never argued against that. What I argue against is this idea around here that he’s some elite guy just because he’s the 3rd best guy in the depleted Braves system, or that he is a mortal lock to be a Top 100 guy on every single list that’s ever published.
The facts are he is a toolsy guy who posts mediocre production despite sky high BABIP because he can’t make enough contact. That screams 4th OFer who is non-tendered by the time he reaches arb 1 or 2. That is literally the story of all those guys.
There’s certainly time for that story to change, but as of right now there’s zero data available to suggest it has.
The problem is you think that's realistic rather than near best case.
Realistically, there isn't much of a reason why he can't be another Drew Stubbs/Michael Taylor type of player. His defense is reportedly very good and he has a decent amount of pop. Those guys have value while they're cheap.
Best case scenario is something similar to Starling Marte.
You could say the same for most teams that are not top 6-7 farm systems right now. Losing development in 2020 is going to affect that. The Braves still have lots of talent that could/should see improvement this year and take the place of those exhausting their eligibility. I imagine at this time in 2022, we'll have at least new 2-3 more names on top 100 lists. Muller, Langeliers, Shoemake, and Contreras are all somewhat likely candidates to be featured on Top 100 lists by mid-season. And this makes no mention of possibly our highest upside hitters in Harris and Ball who definitely would have moved on to one of these lists had they continued their trends from 2019. Schuster also has a chance to make a top 100 list if his rookie campaign goes well.
Not really. The team's draft approach has been strategic and will change as their needs change. Had they not lost out on international resources, they'd be fine. That's the killer.
What part of "would be thrilled" did you misunderstand?
I have no clue what kind of player he will be, nor have I claimed to - I do know that he wouldn't be the first-ever player to have an oddly-high BABIP if he succeeds on some level. He also wouldn't be the first one to get better as he approached his mid-20s. What I do know is...
The organization appears to be higher on him than Enscheff (right or wrong), and apparently thinks he's not that far away from getting a shot - otherwise there would be more urgency to "figure out" LF. If they didn't feel pretty good about Waters, they could have gotten Pederson or Rosario pretty easily simply by offering a second year.
Maybe they feel like a Mazara and Duvall platoon in 2021 won't be any (or much) worse than a Pederson/Rosario and Duvall platoon would have been, who knows? All signs point to Waters being given his shot in 2022 at the latest since they've been aggressive with his promotions and apparently haven't had any interest in including him in trades.
"He spent much of his time at alternate camp working on his overall approach, one that has produced a career 26.2 percent strikeout rate and just a seven percent walk rate, and the Braves feel his time facing so many advanced arms last summer will benefit him and allow him to be a more advanced hitter and to tap into his raw power more consistently."
That's from his prospect write-up on mlb.com.
I understand the argument that his numbers are not sustainable, but it is not as if he has been dominating inferior pitching. In the last two years of game action, he has been from 2.4 to 6.9 years younger than the average competition. His speed gives significant doubles power.
If the above from MLB is true, it suggests to me his approach did fail at the alternate site last season and he worked hard, against better pitching than he had previously seen, to improve his approach. Until we see him play, only those that were watching the alternate site know if Waters will be given a shot in 2022. The fact that AA seems to be against including him in a trade tells me AA sees a path for him to play in 2022.
Will he be a switch hitting, doubles machine playing GG caliber defense in LF? Who knows, but I'm a little more concerned about the splits from the right side than the approach of a kid that has produced at every level regardless of age difference.