Braves sign Freeman to 8 year 135M deal! *Updated to 135m*

thewupk said

"He also had a very high BABIP in 2013 that's not likely sustainable."

You said

"I don't know...."

One would assume that infers you think that his .371 BABIP is sustainable.

"
 
I don't know, Freeman always hits for a high average and even as prospect was projected to be the type of hitter that competes for batting titles.

371 just isn't sustainable though. Two of the best BABIP lords of our time are Votto and Ichiro. And for their careers they are at 359 and 344 respectively. Even if you take Ichiro's decline out of the picture he still posted a 357 BABIP from 2001-2009. That's not to say he won't have anymore years like 2013 and post a BABIP. But he's just as likely to do that as he is to have a BABIP of around 300 like in 2012. And there wasn't much difference in his batted ball profile except for a 5% drop in infield flies. But that's not going to account for a 75 point increase in BABIP. The true is he will likely be in the 330-350 range. Still well above average and likely where he should be given his high line drive rate. But that is the difference between hitting 319 as he did in 2013 and 290-300 as most people project for him.
 
thewupk said

"He also had a very high BABIP in 2013 that's not likely sustainable."

You said

"I don't know...."

One would assume that infers you think that his .371 BABIP is sustainable.
"

I said it was very likely he sustains a high BABIP, especially over his peak years. At no time did I say that he would be able to sustain a .371 BABIP over the course of his career.

Reading comprehension fail.
 
371 just isn't sustainable though. Two of the best BABIP lords of our time are Votto and Ichiro. And for their careers they are at 359 and 344 respectively. Even if you take Ichiro's decline out of the picture he still posted a 357 BABIP from 2001-2009. That's not to say he won't have anymore years like 2013 and post a BABIP. But he's just as likely to do that as he is to have a BABIP of around 300 like in 2012. And there wasn't much difference in his batted ball profile except for a 5% drop in infield flies. But that's not going to account for a 75 point increase in BABIP. The true is he will likely be in the 330-350 range. Still well above average and likely where he should be given his high line drive rate. But that is the difference between hitting 319 as he did in 2013 and 290-300 as most people project for him.

I would say you have to contribute a good bit of the difference between 12 and 13 to simply the natural progression of a hitter. Again, not going to hit .319 every yr, but during his prime it would not be out of the ordinary to see similar #'s.
 
Of course he isn't going to average a .370 BABIP over his career, and I never said he would. But he should continue to maintain a better than average BABIP throughout his career. Hitters, like Freeman, who show a skill set to hit .300 consistently are always going to have a better than average BABIP. And it would not be surprising if, during his peak yrs, Freeman replicated his 2013 numbers.

Will Clark, Mark Grace, and Sean Casey tend to be Freeman's most favorable comps. All of these guys maintained better than average BABIP's for most of their career.

Grace had a career 309 BABIP. Casey was at 319. Nothing really our of the ordinary with those two. And honestly those are horrible comparisons. Grace and Casey didn't strike out at all or have near the power that Freeman does.
 
I would say you have to contribute a good bit of the difference between 12 and 13 to simply the natural progression of a hitter. Again, not going to hit .319 every yr, but during his prime it would not be out of the ordinary to see similar #'s.

So what changed other then his BABIP being 70 points higher? He walked the same. Struck out 1.6% less. Had the same amount of power. Hit the same amount of line drives. I think most of it revolves around luck. He was unlucky in 2012 and quite a bit luckier in 2013.
 
I would say you have to contribute a good bit of the difference between 12 and 13 to simply the natural progression of a hitter. Again, not going to hit .319 every yr, but during his prime it would not be out of the ordinary to see similar #'s.

Thing that people need to grasp, the prime is now. Players don't peak in their late 20s like they used to now that the minors are actually funded.
 
Thing that people need to grasp, the prime is now. Players don't peak in their late 20s like they used to now that the minors are actually funded.

LOLWUT?

Prime years is usually around 25-33 or so.

Some players age better/worse than others.
 
To counteract though I believe that his BB/KK% will improve as well as his power. I just dont' get why people are sure that last year was an aberration for Freeman.

That very well could happen. And if it does he may be able to sustain a high 800 OPS. However people saying last year was an aberration for Freddie are referring to his 370 BABIP. That won't continue. I would hope you can see that. And when that levels out his overall numbers will drop unless his BB/KK% improve or he hits more homers. That's a fact. So yes that is why 2013 will be an aberration. That's not to say he won't be a good hitter. He just won't be 900 OPS good unless he improves in other areas.
 
Grace had a career 309 BABIP. Casey was at 319. Nothing really our of the ordinary with those two. And honestly those are horrible comparisons. Grace and Casey didn't strike out at all or have near the power that Freeman does.

Well I did say for the majority of their careers. Grace averaged .318 BABIP for most of his career. His last few yrs in the league brought down that number down a bit understandably as his skills faded. And in the case of Caseym I would consider a career a .320 BABIP to be at least a little out of the ordinary.
 
Well I did say for the majority of their careers. Grace averaged .318 BABIP for most of his career. His last few yrs in the league brought down that number down a bit understandably as his skills faded. And in the case of Caseym I would consider a career a .320 BABIP to be at least a little out of the ordinary.

Well we have batted ball data for half of Caseys career and only two years for Grace. Both were around 23%. A LD% like that is usually going to reflect a higher than average BABIP. So in that context it's not really out of the ordinary. And I suspect Grace's LD% would be higher then that in his prime. The point is those were low strikeout, low homerun hitting 1B. Not comparable at all to Freeman.
 
So what changed other then his BABIP being 70 points higher? He walked the same. Struck out 1.6% less. Had the same amount of power. Hit the same amount of line drives. I think most of it revolves around luck. He was unlucky in 2012 and quite a bit luckier in 2013.

His struckout less, walked more (slightly), and hit line drives at a much higher rate.
 
His struckout less, walked more (slightly), and hit line drives at a much higher rate.

None of those were at a much higher rate. His LD% went from 26% in 2012 to 26.7% in 2013. Slight improvements in LD% don't account for a 75 point increase in BABIP.
 
So what changed other then his BABIP being 70 points higher? He walked the same. Struck out 1.6% less. Had the same amount of power. Hit the same amount of line drives. I think most of it revolves around luck. He was unlucky in 2012 and quite a bit luckier in 2013.

What about Freeman's spray chart? Was there much difference between 2012 and 2013? That can lead to having a much higher BABIP from one year to the next.
 
What about Freeman's spray chart? Was there much difference between 2012 and 2013? That can lead to having a much higher BABIP from one year to the next.

Nothing too drastic. He pulled the ball slightly more then going up the middle. His opposite field hits were roughly the same.
 
None of those were at a much higher rate. His LD% went from 26% in 2012 to 26.7% in 2013. Slight improvements in LD% don't account for a 75 point increase in BABIP.

What site are you looking at for your info?

BR says he went from 23% in 2012 to 30% in 2013.
 
Back
Top