yup...you didn't disappoint me
The truth shouldn't disappoint anyone.
This is a pandemic of the unhealthy and not one of the unmasked or unvaccinated. Its just a lazy classification because we aren't allowed to hurt peoples feelings anymore.
yup...you didn't disappoint me
The truth shouldn't disappoint anyone.
This is a pandemic of the unhealthy and not one of the unmasked or unvaccinated. Its just a lazy classification because we aren't allowed to hurt peoples feelings anymore.
The truth shouldn't disappoint anyone.
This is a pandemic of the unhealthy and not one of the unmasked or unvaccinated. Its just a lazy classification because we aren't allowed to hurt peoples feelings anymore.
it is a pandemic in which there are multiple factors affecting outcomes...one is pre-existing conditions such as obesity...another is vaccination status...i'm heartened by your endorsement of the truth
it is a pandemic in which there are multiple factors affecting outcomes...one is pre-existing conditions such as obesity...another is vaccination status
Don't forget seasonalities like Sweden!
dude...you are the one who appears to be a late convert to seasonal factors which affect how much time people spend indoors...all i can say is welcome aboard...what took ya so long
And both impact the individual.
There are no externalities with either other than the freakout from people like you who are more than happy to put hundreds of millions of people into poverty because of their choices.
FYI - A healthy unvaccinated person is still at less risk than an unhealthy vaccinated individual.
if an infectious disease is not an example of an externality then their isn't any such thing
How are there externalities when both vaccinated and unvaccinated spread and contract the virus at the same rate? Seems like a push and therefore not relevant to the conversation.
He doesn't believe that vaccinated spread virus.
He calls this anti Vax bull ****
How are there externalities when both vaccinated and unvaccinated spread and contract the virus at the same rate? Seems like a push and therefore not relevant to the conversation.
I believe
1) an unvaccinated person is more likely to spread covid
2) an unvaccinated person is more likely to require medical care (the cost of which is largely socialized through insurance)
3) an unvaccinated person is more likely to become disabled (another cost born by the rest of us rather than the individual making the choice not to be vaccinated)
Those are all examples of what makes an infectious disease a source of externalities
Additionally there is the greater risk of new variants arising if large parts of the population remain unvaccinated. Also an example of an externality.
You can believe (1) and your final point all you want.
There is nothing in the data that suggests this and we are actually getting information that directly goes against your 'beliefs'.
Further, (2) & (3) biggest driver is quality of health of the individual and not vaccination status. I get why you want to make it about vaccines to push your beliefs on others but it just isn't true and it will never be true.
i'm not arguing that vaccination status is the only thing affecting a person's health...that's not necessary for my second and third points to be valid