The Coronavirus, not the beer

got it so someone who has their 2 shots but hasn't gotten the third will be barred from buying groceries? and that extra shot needs to happen every 8 months because that number sounded better than every 12 months to Pfizer's bottom line

hell of a society the progressive are building.

you know there are all sort of shots that kids have to get that involve a booster...i guess this is news to you...if they don't update their records to show they got the booster they can't go to school...the covid booster is not different from other boosters...it is a bizarre hangup...be not afraid
 
you know there are all sort of shots that kids have to get that involve a booster...i guess this is news to you...if they don't update their records to show they got the booster they can't go to school

How long have those vaccines been tested for?
 
you know there are all sort of shots that kids have to get that involve a booster...i guess this is news to you...if they don't update their records to show they got the booster they can't go to school...the covid booster is not different from other boosters...it is a bizarre hangup...be not afraid

Can they go to a private restaurant?
 
While we are likening this to previous vaccinations can anyone tell me which ones require quarterly boosters so you can participate in society?
 
I'm Team Pfizer all the way.

Eat $#!+ Moderna and J&J losers.

I got 1st shot of phizer, and caught the virus almost immediately after. Sorta crazy, that I had been around several personal outbreaks, NYC late December 2019, and Mardi Gras 2020. I will admit I had a very mild case.

My wife hasn't been vaccinated, and her case (same time as mine) was mild too.
 
We have the biggest city in the country making it illegal for business to serve willing US customers

Hell of a society progressives are building
 
We have the biggest city in the country making it illegal for business to serve willing US customers

Hell of a society progressives are building

personally i think cold hard cash is the better way to incentivize taking the vaccine...these rules like vaccine passports to eat at a restaurant strike me as an inefficient way to do it...but generally i think people who choose not to vaccinate are spreading the virus and contributing to other negative externalities and society is entitled to find ways to make them pay a price for that

it's not a situation where someone is exercising a choice and bearing all the costs of that choice
 
Last edited:
hundreds of millions have taken it....it has saved hundreds of thousands of lives...be not afraid

Oh - I am in favor of those at risk to take them for sure. Its been great for that subset of people.

Still doesn't answer my question when you move into the non-at risk population.
 
Setting aside the moral, legal, philosophical questions about a vaccine passport …it’s only effective if being vaccinated is a proxy for being not infected. My fully vaccinated cousin just tested positive. If you can still carry the virus and give it to others, the passport system is a nothing but theater. She was out at restaurants, malls, etc the past several days. Her showing the card did nothing to reduce the externalities to others. If anything, it increased her cost to society, as the vaccine card was a license to breathe shared air at indoor establishments.
 
Setting aside the moral, legal, philosophical questions about a vaccine passport …it’s only effective if being vaccinated is a proxy for being not infected. My fully vaccinated cousin just tested positive. She was out at restaurants, malls, etc the past several days. Her showing the card did nothing to reduce the externalities to others. If anything, it increased her cost to society, as the vaccine card was a license to breathe shared air at indoor establishments.

Once the breakthrough cases became mainstream, the case for mandates completely went out of the window
 
personally i think cold hard cash is the better way to incentivize taking the vaccine...these rules like vaccine passports to eat at a restaurant strike me as an inefficient way to do it...but generally i think people who choose not to vaccinate are spreading the virus and contributing to other negative externalities and society is entitled to find ways to make them pay a price for that

it's not a situation where someone is exercising a choice and bearing all the costs of that choice


Yes I know you are in favor of bankrupting your grandkids to make you feel safer.

But it is still wild to me how supportive you are of the government banning restaurants from serving willing customers.

I thought we fought and won that battle back in the 60s... but as usual, progressives take us backwards
 
Back
Top