Hopefully the Phillies trade every single good prospects for Reynolds.
My personal opinion Pache need more playing time.
lol Phillies have a horrible farm system
Hopefully the Phillies trade every single good prospects for Reynolds.
My personal opinion Pache need more playing time.
lol Phillies have a horrible farm system
I know Pache's defensive stats are promising (to say the least), but he has looked awkward and terrified out there at the Major League level. Worrisome.
I would roll with a Duvall/Joc platoon. That would also help not break one of them down over a full year in CF.
We have Fried and Soroka for 3 more years
Riley for 4 years and Anderson for 5
Reynolds is under control for 4 more years. There is an argument for going for it big over the next 3-4 years.
What does our depth look like afterwards if we are giving up something like Strider/Grisson/Harris/Schuster?
Thats the type of package its going to take.
It wouldn't look good. I don't think I would do it. But there is an argument for maximizing your current window even if it shortens it. If the Braves just hadn't won I would be more opposed to it. Keep the window open as long as possible. But they did win and I'm greedy.
It wouldn't look good. I don't think I would do it. But there is an argument for maximizing your current window even if it shortens it. If the Braves just hadn't won I would be more opposed to it. Keep the window open as long as possible. But they did win and I'm greedy.
I almost look at it the opposite way.
The next year or two is gravy. I want to be good now for a long time.
I have confidence that the core talent we have now is good enough to win next year as long as we compliment it with two big FA bats.
I’ve long stated 3/90 with an option is what I would pay for a 1B in his 30s.
However, I lack a lot of context and data AA has access to. Maybe they have analysis that shows he won’t age like a typical 1B. Maybe they have data that shows he benefits the club financially in some unique way. Maybe they know payroll will be $200M 3 years from now, so there’s plenty of room to overpay a declining 1B in the future.
We’ve all seen the data about aging guys at 1B, but the best chance to win for the next 2-3 years may very well be tied to the fact that it will hamper the chances to win in 2025 and beyond. If the plan is to take on a mini rebuild after Fried and Morton are gone anyways, maybe paying Freeman huge money in the last couple years of his deal while the team rebuilds isn’t so bad.
One reason is the assumption that some if not all of Ozuna’s money will not have to be paid in 2022 due to a coming suspension.
Another is that Acuna and Ozzie will start to cost more in coming years.
Finally there is the idea of paying for production as you get it, as opposed to deferring some of the cost to future years. A typical Freeman season would be worth $40MM. He’s more likely to be worth that next year than he is to be worth $30MM plus at the end of a five year deal. I understand the concern about inflation as well as the time value of money. The front load is more about preserving the competitive window for a little longer.
100% agree with this.Even ignoring time value of money, our roster is such that we should be contending now... and front loading Freddie's deal makes it hard for us to add to our roster now, which hurts our chances of winning now, which is what our roster is set up to do.
This is the boat Im in as well. Now that we won a title, just try to remain good for years to come. Absolutely resist temptation to shorten the window by going "all in" when we know how flukey the playoffs are.
"I have Verlander to the Braves as of right now." -Trevor Plouffe
Ok - Didn't want a pitcher because I thought it would be some trash retread at 10M.
If Verlander wants to come here for 2 years 30-40 then Lets do it.
I think Verlander winds up in LA or Anaheim
I think Verlander winds up in LA or Anaheim
I think the window will close very fast if we don’t sign Freddie. Next year Swanson, the following Max and then who knows.