Rittenhouse trial

mqt said:
They also dueled each other, enslaved people and stole land from its inhabitants. Perhaps we should strive to take the good parts of our founding but not follow their example 100%.
Click to expand...

Brave 17 year old men is the most impressive thing that should remain in perpetuity.

I understand your side hates that.
 
Tapate50 said:
Why
Click to expand...

One had a toy gun and was shot by police.

the other had an AR-15 and wasnt

One was a POC the other wasn't.

The contrast is as plain as well, black and white

//////

Willing to bet you had no idea who Tamir Rice was.
Guess we could contrast Tamir Rice with Dylan Roof as well

I am not advocating Rittenhouse or Roof should have been shot
Just pointing out the situational differing methods of policing
 
57Brave said:
One had a toy gun and was shot by police.

the other had an AR-15 and wasnt

One was a POC the other wasn't.

The contrast is as plain as well, black and white

//////

Willing to bet you had no idea who Tamir Rice was.
Guess we could contrast Tamir Rice with Dylan Roof as well

I am not advocating Rittenhouse or Roof should have been shot
Just pointing out the situational differing methods of policing
Click to expand...

There are literally hundreds if not thousands of cases where black men are not shot in the US per day. Should they bring those in as well?

Why would it apply here?

Why would a court bring in another case of a kid carrying a toy gun to this case? Should we bring in the case of a white guy that WAS shot by policy when he had a gun? If not, why?
 
Tapate50 said:
There are literally hundreds if not thousands of cases where black men are not shot in the US per day. Should they bring those in as well?

Why would it apply here?

Why would a court bring in another case of a kid carrying a toy gun to this case? Should we bring in the case of a white guy that WAS shot by policy when he had a gun? If not, why?
Click to expand...

You actually think he is going to answer this?

Dude is a clown.
 
thethe said:
You actually think he is going to answer this?

Dude is a clown.
Click to expand...

As poorly as he communicates his intent, he may think this guy needs to go to jail just because Tamir Rice was shot by a police officer. I don't think its out of the realm of possibility he's that deranged, but i guess we can find out.
 
Tapate50 said:
As poorly as he communicates his intent, he may think this guy needs to go to jail just because Tamir Rice was shot by a police officer. I don't think its out of the realm of possibility he's that deranged, but i guess we can find out.
Click to expand...

He thinks because one black person got shot by a cop that all black people are shot while white people are brought by chariot to their freedom.

As soon as everyone treats people like him as a joke the sooner we are to building back America.
 
sturg33 said:
[tw]1461007893528985616[/tw]
Click to expand...

This isn’t really a major gotcha. Both individuals had the right to be there. It’s just weird to defend Rittenhouse as protecting his neighborhood when he wasn’t in his neighborhood. Nobody serious is claiming the people who he shot were defending their community from what I can tell.
 
His father lives there. He frequently spent time there

Just another sheep who will defend anything the leftist propaganda machine spits out.
 
Defense just brought up the fact that was pointed out by right wing Twitter commenters that the AI video enhancement company specifies that their software is not appropriate for judicial evidence. This trial has been crazy.
 
Jaw said:
Defense just brought up the fact that was pointed out by right wing Twitter commenters that the AI video enhancement company specifies that their software is not appropriate for judicial evidence. This trial has been crazy.
Click to expand...

Right wing Twitter is always ahead of the curve.
 
[tw]1461054653060108291[/tw]

It takes a special kind of scumbag to support anything the Democrats are doing now.
 
I'm confident that this case wouldn't have gone to trial if it hadn't occurred during the Summer of Peaceful Arson, Looting, Assault, and Murder. BLM isn't the DNC, but the media promotion of their rioting occurred because the media perception was that the rioting helped the DNC.

I'm also curious how many stern warnings the judge will give the prosecutors. Isn't this 3 now? One for bringing up the 5th Amendment, one for bringing in evidence the judge had twice excluded, and one today for not providing the defense team the same video the defense essentially made the key to their case. I remember Mrs. Sales teaching us that prosecutors couldn't do that in 9th grade Civics class. This is ridiculous.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top