Rittenhouse trial

I think it’s confirmed they were shooting and attacking Rittenhouse via FBI footage that was “lost”
 
Was it confirmed or lost?
Cuz it couldn't be both

Still no verification that the victims were looters or just protesters
 
I think it’s confirmed they were shooting and attacking Rittenhouse via FBI footage that was “lost”

there is footage of them committing assault and battery and one of them committed assault and battery with a deadly weapon which are way worse charges then looting
 
Not saying there wasn't looting, but, were the shooting victims looting?
Are they on video breaking iand/or stealing property ?

Or do we take it for granted ?
 
Do we know if in fact any of the victims were looting or if they were just in the crowd.

Wtf do you think “those others” in my post means ?

No reflection on the assailants what so ever.

But yes they were confirmed to be assaulting the victim once the video was “found” again.

Being purposely obtuse isn’t a character trait to be proud of
 
the looters should be in jail.

I asked if they were in fact looting.
There is no proof.

This report from CBS News:

" According to court documents, Rittenhouse traveled from his home in Antioch, Illinois, to patrol Kenosha during the unrest, when he shot and killed Rosenbaum after a brief altercation in a parking lot in which Rosenbaum tried to take his gun. The incident was caught on video, and as Rittenhouse ran away he was seen making a phone call saying "I just killed somebody."

As he fled the scene, videos show a group of people pursuing Rittenhouse saying "beat him up!", "hey, he shot him!", "get him! Get that dude!" Rittenhouse then allegedly tripped and fell to the ground, at which point Huber, seen holding a skateboard, tried to take his gun when Rittenhouse allegedly shot and killed him. Shortly after Huber was shot, Rittenhouse also allegedly shot a third victim, Gaige Grosskreutz, in the arm. Grosskreutz reportedly was holding a handgun at the time he was shot. Rittenhouse's lawyers claim he acted in self-defense. "


I am not arguing the verdict or my opinion of the case.
But calling them "looters" is unfounded
let alone speculating the three victims should be in jail for looting

this isnt hard
 
They weren’t looting because they are white. That is the only answer according to the media now.
 
Arizona university students demand administration to 'withdraw' Kyle Rittenhouse: 'killer off our campus'

https://www.foxnews.com/us/arizona-...d-administration-to-withdraw-kyle-rittenhouse

The groups also demand that the university administration "reaffirm support for the multicultural center on campus as a safe space from White Supremacy."


"The goal of these demands is to let the ASU administration know that we as the ASU community do not feel safe knowing that a mass shooter, who has expressed violent intentions about ‘protecting property’ over people, is so carelessly allowed to be admitted to the school at all," the spokesperson said. "Our campus is already unsafe as is, and we would like to abate this danger as much as possible."

The Students for Socialism chapter spokesperson contended that the Rittenhouse trial "effectively gives right-winged individuals the license to kill other individuals who protest for human rights."

"Rittenhouse took the lives of innocent people with the intent to do so—by strapping an assault rifle to himself in a crowd of unarmed citizens. That is the textbook definition of intention. The decision made by the court is one of thousands of cases that have been influenced by biased judges, predominantly white juries, and mistakes inherent in a judicial system founded off of injustice to begin with," the spokesperson said.

...

KR is an online student

Haha, my generation raised a whole lot of babies
 
Back
Top