zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
That's the MSM/Maricopa spin. Here's the reality 1) Maricopa had no business touching the machines because they were under subpoena. That means they can't be touched. 2) As thethe said when they "archived" the material they didn't hand the election data over at the time. They still to this day haven't handed over the election data that was court ordered for them to produce. Ben Cotton, the man who was in charge of auditing the machines says some of the data wasn't archived but straight up deleted. 3) Why did they "archive" the 2020 election material but the 2018 and 2019 election data are still there on the drive? 4) Maricopa changed their story. They said they archived because they needed the room on the drive. Now they're talking about risk to the data. The data was not at risk. Hogwash.
"Real audit"? You mean that chicken **** operation Dominion lackeys did a few months earlier who said the machines were not hooked up to the internet and Mr. Cotton proved they were?
They weren't connected to the internet.
[tw]1441529885722251269[/tw]
I mean they were hunting and pecking. Cotton is the same person who said he recovered files that the county pointed out were always there.
I'm not going down this road again. Cotton was heavily contradicted by other cyber experts as well. Cotton is also the one talking about software not being up to date which creates issues, but such is not a problem with air gapped networks. I know a bit about airgapped networks because I have a few friedns who run IT at hospitals and they talked about how frustrating it is because everything runs on ancient windows (I forget if it was server 98 or 2000)
I'll again direct you here and read from a Cybersecurity expert who doesn't have a for profit reason to find something
[tw]1441518133689438211[/tw]