oppression AND tyranny

How does something being in the constitutional n dictate whether it is racist?

If a restaurant owner puts up "no blacks allowed" sign, are you saying it's not racist bc there is no constitutional right to eat in a restaurant?

Will ask again
 
Canada removing parents right to see child

The useful idiots cheer

[Tw]1481775395884122114[/tw]


As abhorrent as this is its hardly new, just a new reason. I have seen CPS threaten to take away a fathers parental rights for not agreeing to not give the child a sugar free soda. I have seen a father in the UK jailed without even a trial for the heinous crime of wishing his kid a happy 18th birthday on Facebook. CPS is one of the most evil organizations I know of. They will take a child for BS reasons then give that child to a child molester and when all is revealed they say they have no legal responsibility for what happened. I have even seen CPS in court saying they did not know they could not lie in order to get a removal order for a child. In almost all cases not involving sexual abuse it's more damaging to the child to be taken away from their biological parents. Some people even treat foster care as a business taking on a bunch of kids and starving them spending almost nothing of what the government pays them on the kids.
 
Last edited:
How does something being in the constitutional n dictate whether it is racist?

If a restaurant owner puts up "no blacks allowed" sign, are you saying it's not racist bc there is no constitutional right to eat in a restaurant?

Let me make it clear to you since clearly you cannot read.

"I know what you'll attempt to cite but looking at numbers yes the black population of DC is less vaccinated than the White and API. But except for young kids their rates are right with white people, Overall 40% of the black population is vaccinated, compared to 45% of the white population. For something to be racist it has to confer a clear advantage or disadvantage to a race'
 
it's weird i can post an answer to his question and he doesn't like said answer so he continues with "asking again" lol


much less that his questions are off topic of anything i'm talking about lol
 
Let me make it clear to you since clearly you cannot read.

"I know what you'll attempt to cite but looking at numbers yes the black population of DC is less vaccinated than the White and API. But except for young kids their rates are right with white people, Overall 40% of the black population is vaccinated, compared to 45% of the white population. For something to be racist it has to confer a clear advantage or disadvantage to a race'

But as you made clear in the MLB all star game thread... The racist part is the requiring ID... Because supposedly black people can't afford to get an ID

So whether they are vaccinated or not is irrelevant. The mayor is requiring they show an ID which you have previously stated is a racist policy

So I'm really not following how this requirement for people to show photo ID is NOT racist
 
it's weird i can post an answer to his question and he doesn't like said answer so he continues with "asking again" lol


much less that his questions are off topic of anything i'm talking about lol
I just went back and looked and you never answered the question.

You posted a few times in fact how you won't answer the question

I understand of course that you can't answer it... But it's always fun to keep highlighting your inability to make an argument m

You're free to prove me wrong

(This is the part where you won't prove me wrong)
 
But a reminder that Goldy also fell for the hilarious Jim Crow B's due to GA requiring photo ID last spring.

The democratic party is incredibly lucky to have him
 
Still haven’t learned “can’t”

Leaves little faith for the more difficult words on your winter reading list to learn


Sucks you’re too stupid to know I did answer it. Just not the way you wanted
 
But as you made clear in the MLB all star game thread... The racist part is the requiring ID... Because supposedly black people can't afford to get an ID

So whether they are vaccinated or not is irrelevant. The mayor is requiring they show an ID which you have previously stated is a racist policy

So I'm really not following how this requirement for people to show photo ID is NOT racist

I thought about it. I had literally one post in that all star game thread it was this

Scrolls through federal papers and constitution

Hmmm don't see any constitutional rights for someone to have a Paypal account.
 
Still haven’t learned “can’t”

Leaves little faith for the more difficult words on your winter reading list to learn


Sucks you’re too stupid to know I did answer it. Just not the way you wanted

Correct. You can't. As in unable to. Not intelligent enough to do it
 
Let me make it clear to you since clearly you cannot read.

"I know what you'll attempt to cite but looking at numbers yes the black population of DC is less vaccinated than the White and API. But except for young kids their rates are right with white people, Overall 40% of the black population is vaccinated, compared to 45% of the white population. For something to be racist it has to confer a clear advantage or disadvantage to a race'

Requiring voter ID would apply to exactly 100% of asians, blacks, native americans, hispanics, and whites, so it doesn't confer a clear advantage or disadvantage to a race.
 
There’s no hope for you it seems

Sad when a bored wanna be crypto boy who spends so much time trying to own people on the internet can’t learn basic definitions
 
Imagine being so stupid that you cannot answer a direct, basic question about if something is racist.

But he can't. Unable to.
 
Back
Top