The Paul Pelosi Attacker

The path between far left and far -right is a well trod one. DePape wouldnt be the first to go from liberal freak to Q luvin Big Lie luvin anti semite.
 
I like this idea that it’s super concerning and telling that the Uber-elite Pelosi didn’t have a SWAT team on site to stop this man, but that it simultaneously wouldn’t be even weirder for Pelosi to be hanging out with random poor crazies.
 
I like this idea that it’s super concerning and telling that the Uber-elite Pelosi didn’t have a SWAT team on site to stop this man, but that it simultaneously wouldn’t be even weirder for Pelosi to be hanging out with random poor crazies.

do you believe the Pelosi's do not have any security at their home? Or do you believe this person was able to get past them with no notice until Paul called the police? I assume your position requires you to believe one of these two options
 
The anti vaxxer part has incarnations both in the loony left and loony right. Northern Cal has a long and not so distinguished left wing anti vaxxer movement.
 
do you believe the Pelosi's do not have any security at their home? Or do you believe this person was able to get past them with no notice until Paul called the police? I assume your position requires you to believe one of these two options

I suppose we’ll eventually find out together what happened. I just don’t see how the man not being stopped by a security measure is inherently more believable than the **** the Right has thrown at the wall so far during the information vacuum.
 
I suppose we’ll eventually find out together what happened. I just don’t see how the man not being stopped by a security measure is inherently more believable than the **** the Right has thrown at the wall so far during the information vacuum.

Your position and the narratives official position is that he was not stopped by security. So that required the belief that they do not have security or that he was able to bypass it completely up until police showed up.

Which of those two options do you believe is true?
 
Your position and the narratives official position is that he was not stopped by security. So that required the belief that they do not have security or that he was able to bypass it completely up until police showed up.

Which of those two options do you believe is true?

I don’t have enough knowledge of the Pelosi family security or neighborhood to offer a real answer and neither do you. The difference is that you’re taking that same lack of knowledge and running with it to promote a fringe conspiracy that has plenty of its own inconsistencies that you have to look past.
 
I don’t have enough knowledge of the Pelosi family security or neighborhood to offer a real answer and neither do you. The difference is that you’re taking that same lack of knowledge and running with it to promote a fringe conspiracy that has plenty of its own inconsistencies that you have to look past.

I am willing to go on record and assume that the Pelosi's have a robust security system for their home

I would be shocked if I am wrong... and I would fear for their safety if they do not
 
How is it possible that people don’t think wealth people lack security systems at their home?
 
From that article in the tweet:



It’s maybe a bit irrational to try to make sense of the politics of actual crazy people.

I think anyone that’s trying to project any type of greater meaning to the actions of someone who clearly needs medication and hospitalization will be sorely disappointed.

The gay lover story to me is a reach. But the Pelosi family clearly needs to immediately fire their entire security operation.
 
I think anyone that’s trying to project any type of greater meaning to the actions of someone who clearly needs medication and hospitalization will be sorely disappointed.

The gay lover story to me is a reach. But the Pelosi family clearly needs to immediately fire their entire security operation.

Agreed, and that goes for the left as well. There’s a clear, very slimy focus from the Left to pin this directly on Republican lawmakers and that’s misguided. While I do think Trump and some of his supporters in public office have done a lot to escalate the divide in this nation, so has the Left. Many crazy people are certainly radicalized by some of this rhetoric, but it’s really just the flavor of the week. If not Nancy Pelosi, he could have been radicalized to violently attack any number of people from any community, be it for political reasons, religion, sports, etc.
 
Agreed, and that goes for the left as well. There’s a clear, very slimy focus from the Left to pin this directly on Republican lawmakers and that’s misguided. While I do think Trump and some of his supporters in public office have done a lot to escalate the divide in this nation, so has the Left. Many crazy people are certainly radicalized by some of this rhetoric, but it’s really just the flavor of the week. If not Nancy Pelosi, he could have been radicalized to violently attack any number of people from any community, be it for political reasons, religion, sports, etc.

Totally agree.
 
As far out as gay lover is it’s infinitely more likely than MAGA

I’d love to hear the explanation for why it’s *more* probable that a known lunatic was in an affair with Paul Pelosi and somebody created a fake blog for him using right-wing talking points than that this deeply troubled person actually wanted to hurt Nancy Pelosi. He’s not working *for* MAGA politicians to do this, but it’s certainly not unreasonable to guess he had a warped worldview that would lead him to commit this violence.
 
Back
Top