The Paul Pelosi Attacker

Bump from page 1

This actually raises a question of why you would assume it’s fishy due to inadequate security, but agree it’s reasonable that a guy could get a gun into a private congressional practice and shoot a Republican lawmaker despite there being 3 police officers on-site.
 
This actually raises a question of why you would assume it’s fishy due to inadequate security, but agree it’s reasonable that a guy could get a gun into a private congressional practice and shoot a Republican lawmaker despite there being 3 police officers on-site.

I don't recall all the details of that event but I think it's more plausible to open fire in an outdoor event than to get past security at a private residence with zero alarms

but hey... you're not willing to post it, but it's clear from your dancing that you do not believe the Pelosi's have security at their mansion

that's quite the faith in the narrative
 
I don't recall all the details of that event but I think it's more plausible to open fire in an outdoor event than to get past security at a private residence with zero alarms

but hey... you're not willing to post it, but it's clear from your dancing that you do not believe the Pelosi's have security at their mansion

that's quite the faith in the narrative

No, I just don’t know what the security is and what potential failings there could be.
 
I’d love to hear the explanation for why it’s *more* probable that a known lunatic was in an affair with Paul Pelosi and somebody created a fake blog for him using right-wing talking points than that this deeply troubled person actually wanted to hurt Nancy Pelosi. He’s not working *for* MAGA politicians to do this, but it’s certainly not unreasonable to guess he had a warped worldview that would lead him to commit this violence.

Because there is 0 chance that a hippy from SF is doing anything in MAGAs name so therefore any other allegation which hasn’t been completely debunked with facts is infinitely more likely.
 
Because there is 0 chance that a hippy from SF is doing anything in MAGAs name so therefore any other allegation which hasn’t been completely debunked with facts is infinitely more likely.

Again, I don’t think you’re giving enough consideration to how little consistency there is going to be in a troubled person’s mind.
 
Again, I don’t think you’re giving enough consideration to how little consistency there is going to be in a troubled person’s mind.

Even if it’s him just being a generic crazy then it isn’t in MAGAs name so to lay blame in that direction is false at the onset and everyone knows it.

But t he degradation of SF can be laid at then feet of pelosi so whatever she and democrats can do to move the eye on that is what they are doing. Plenty of idiots that will jump to blame MAGA and that will be their only truth.
 
Even if it’s him just being a generic crazy then it isn’t in MAGAs name so to lay blame in that direction is false at the onset and everyone knows it.

But t he degradation of SF can be laid at then feet of pelosi so whatever she and democrats can do to move the eye on that is what they are doing. Plenty of idiots that will jump to blame MAGA and that will be their only truth.

Doing it in MAGA’s name and doing it at the request of MAGA are two very different things. I don’t have any problem with stating that nobody asked this lunatic to bash Paul Pelosi’s head in with a hammer. I *do* have a problem with baselessly claiming that this is some sort of false flag or running absolutely ****ing wild with conspiracies.
 
Sorry I dont subscribe to your land of make believe. But please fill me in. I will leave if it comes true. That's how confident I am you are full of ****.
 
Last edited:
Doing it in MAGA’s name and doing it at the request of MAGA are two very different things. I don’t have any problem with stating that nobody asked this lunatic to bash Paul Pelosi’s head in with a hammer. I *do* have a problem with baselessly claiming that this is some sort of false flag or running absolutely ****ing wild with conspiracies.

A hippy from SF (whose ex now is saying was super liberal) has no affiliation with MAGA and any linking between the two is disgraceful.
 
Sorry I dont subscribe to your land of make believe.

Would make believe he the feds saying the laptop for rich didn’t exist but now acknowledges it does but wants to hold it for 66 years make believe?

I understand you’re a bootlicker now but at this point if a reasonable person isn’t suspicious then I’m not sure what to say.
 
Would make believe he the feds saying the laptop for rich didn’t exist but now acknowledges it does but wants to hold it for 66 years make believe?

I understand you’re a bootlicker now but at this point if a reasonable person isn’t suspicious then I’m not sure what to say.


Maybe you could point me to any case of a private citizen where they released the contents of their laptop to the public.
 
Again, I don’t think you’re giving enough consideration to how little consistency there is going to be in a troubled person’s mind.

Political fringes on both sides are cesspools filled with troubled people. Some of them dabble in both cesspools. Sometimes simultaneously. Sometimes sequentially.
 
Politico: "people are making baseless claims that we reported!"

[tw]1587127018168066049[/tw]

Okay, **** Politico too, but isn’t the key point here that SF Police have stated there wasn’t a third person, yet it’s still a key point in the conspiracy?

Edited to add: There’s a compelling point made in the comments that it could just be sloppy writing that the police did not know who opened the door of the two men. Not necessarily even a gotcha to Politico.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top