sturg33
I
Could be.
I'm leaning more towards the Rand Paul, Brett Kavanaugh, Lee Zeldin, Steve Scalise motivations though
Weird how pelosis security was napping
Bump from page 1
Could be.
I'm leaning more towards the Rand Paul, Brett Kavanaugh, Lee Zeldin, Steve Scalise motivations though
Weird how pelosis security was napping
Bump from page 1
This actually raises a question of why you would assume it’s fishy due to inadequate security, but agree it’s reasonable that a guy could get a gun into a private congressional practice and shoot a Republican lawmaker despite there being 3 police officers on-site.
I don't recall all the details of that event but I think it's more plausible to open fire in an outdoor event than to get past security at a private residence with zero alarms
but hey... you're not willing to post it, but it's clear from your dancing that you do not believe the Pelosi's have security at their mansion
that's quite the faith in the narrative
I’d love to hear the explanation for why it’s *more* probable that a known lunatic was in an affair with Paul Pelosi and somebody created a fake blog for him using right-wing talking points than that this deeply troubled person actually wanted to hurt Nancy Pelosi. He’s not working *for* MAGA politicians to do this, but it’s certainly not unreasonable to guess he had a warped worldview that would lead him to commit this violence.
Because there is 0 chance that a hippy from SF is doing anything in MAGAs name so therefore any other allegation which hasn’t been completely debunked with facts is infinitely more likely.
Again, I don’t think you’re giving enough consideration to how little consistency there is going to be in a troubled person’s mind.
Seth rich is going to be the trigger that gets you to stop posting for good. I’m calling it now.
Even if it’s him just being a generic crazy then it isn’t in MAGAs name so to lay blame in that direction is false at the onset and everyone knows it.
But t he degradation of SF can be laid at then feet of pelosi so whatever she and democrats can do to move the eye on that is what they are doing. Plenty of idiots that will jump to blame MAGA and that will be their only truth.
And people call me a bozo.
Doing it in MAGA’s name and doing it at the request of MAGA are two very different things. I don’t have any problem with stating that nobody asked this lunatic to bash Paul Pelosi’s head in with a hammer. I *do* have a problem with baselessly claiming that this is some sort of false flag or running absolutely ****ing wild with conspiracies.
Sorry I dont subscribe to your land of make believe.
A hippy from SF (whose ex now is saying was super liberal) has no affiliation with MAGA and any linking between the two is disgraceful.
Would make believe he the feds saying the laptop for rich didn’t exist but now acknowledges it does but wants to hold it for 66 years make believe?
I understand you’re a bootlicker now but at this point if a reasonable person isn’t suspicious then I’m not sure what to say.
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/internet-history-of-pelosi-suspect-17545116.php
Sure, why take his own words when you can blindly and confidently state your own perceptions.
We’re these the sites that mysteriously were deleted on Saturday?
Again, I don’t think you’re giving enough consideration to how little consistency there is going to be in a troubled person’s mind.
Politico: "people are making baseless claims that we reported!"
[tw]1587127018168066049[/tw]