sturg33
I
Because there's no constitutional right to a cigarette, and you don't need beer in order to live!
The Biden Presidency
- Thread starter The Tariff King
- Start date
Because there's no constitutional right to a cigarette, and you don't need beer in order to live!
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
This is where you step into the legal quagmire of a few things.
1. As I've said it's stupid to compare constitutional rights to non-constitutional rights.
2. You're also comparing something that's largely up to the discretion of the person who chooses to enforce it to something that is applied to every citizen. For example, if my old ass walks into a bar, odds are I won't be carded.
But again, show me anything that says there isn't racial bias in Voter ID laws.
jgriff3029
Active member
Serious question to Zito and Sturg. Is it more important to ensure everyone who has the right to vote can do so without having to provide and ID, or is it more important to require the ID to ensure that only those who have the right to do so can?
I think I know where one of you stands, no idea on the other.
I think I know where one of you stands, no idea on the other.
sturg33
I
I believe only those who have a right to vote should be allowed to do so
Requiring an ID is probably the best way to implement this. But I'm open to other ideas
The right answer is obvious. The left doesn’t agree with that because they need to cheat as we saw in San Joaquin (which is the norm in democrat ****holes)
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
I support a system where only tax neutral or better person votes. If you are receiving more from the government than you put in then you dont get to vote.
You just gave me a chubby
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Now let me really blow your mind.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/108530-a-democracy-cannot-exist-as-a-permanent-form-of-government
Didn't you hear? Biden made a few phone calls yesterday about Ohio!
He is doing things!!!
What a farce that we have to pretend this vegetable actually is our president.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
Constitution makes it clear who in the US has the right to vote. It also makes it clear penalties (if you will) for when people violate them. I don't expressly care about Voter ID vs. not. I just want the population and house spread to be properly apportioned. So states with Voter ID laws, instead of their number of representatives being based off of eligible adults who can vote. It should be eligible adults who can vote and have a proper Voter ID.
Unlike a lot of people I've had the privilege to live in a Voter ID and a non-Voter ID state. I didn't find the difference to be significant. In one place I said my name and showed my ID. In one place I said my name and full address. Only advantage I'd give NH is I can do same day registration.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA - Sure thing bud.
THats why the left was so terrified of investigations and stopped them at every turn.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
It hasn't even been 24 hours. Some of us have **** we have to do. Sorry I can't live up to your level of loserdom and posting every hour on the hour.
NOt shocking that you can't comprehend that people have other **** to do. As you've spent forever pretending like Voter ID implication isn't racist.
Your claim that its racist is racist itself.
The fact you can't see this is hysterical.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
It's in the constitution. We just need a congress with the stones to appropriately enforce it. Won't happen of course because republicans benefit from stopping people from voting. So they'd stonewall any attempt to enforce the amendments of the constitution