Dominion vs Fox

Man, y'all was played.

the more that comes out the worse you look.

they sold you pig in a poke
 
Man, y'all was played.

the more that comes out the worse you look.

they sold you pig in a poke
Worse than “ I fell for a movie spoof campaign ad that I thought was a documentary about a governors military history, and then doubled Down on it” bad ?
 
Last edited:
between you and me, at whom do you think Fox aimed their campaigns.

and please don't be cute and say " well I don't watch Fox"

point is you don't have to.
the nature of advertising
 
between you and me, at whom do you think Fox aimed their campaigns.

and please don't be cute and say " well I don't watch Fox"

point is you don't have to.
the nature of advertising

I'd bet a good amount of money you watch more fox news than i do
 
While serving as a senior legal advisor to the then-President of the United States and as
counsel for his reelection campaign, Jenna Lynn Ellis (“Respondent”) repeatedly made
misrepresentations on national television and on Twitter, undermining the American public’s
confidence in the 2020 presidential election. The parties stipulate that Respondent’s misconduct
warrants public censure, and the Presiding Disciplinary Judge (“the Court”) approves the parties’
stipulation ...








Respondant agrees she made the following ten misrepresentations:

 On November 13, 2020, Respondent claimed that “Hillary Clinton still has not
conceded the 2016 election.”

 On November 20, 2020, Respondent appeared on Mornings with Maria on Fox
Business and stated: “We have affidavits from witnesses, we have voter intimidation,
we have the ballots that were manipulated, we have all kinds of statistics that show
that this was a coordinated effort in all of these states to transfer votes either from
Trump to Biden, to manipulate the ballots, to count them in secret . . .”

 On November 20, 2020, Respondent appeared on Spicer & Co. and stated, “with all
those states [Nevada, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia] combined we know
that the election was stolen from President Trump and we can prove that.”

 On November 21, 2020, Respondent stated on Twitter under her handle
@JennaEllisEsq., “ . . . SECOND, we will present testimonial and other evidence IN
COURT to show how this election was STOLEN!”

 On November 23, 2020, Respondent appeared on The Ari Melber Show on MSNBC
and stated, “The election was stolen and Trump won by a landslide.”

 On November 30, 2020, Respondent appeared on Mornings with Maria on Fox
Business and stated, “President Trump is right that there was widespread fraud in this
election, we have at least six states that were corrupted, if not more, through their
voting systems. . . We know that President Trump won in a landslide.” She also
stated, “The outcome of this election is actually fraudulent it's wrong, and we
understand than when we subtract all the illegal ballots, you can see that President
Trump actually won in a landslide.”

 On December 3, 2020, Respondent appeared on Mornings with Maria on Fox Business
and stated, “The outcome of this election is actually fraudulent it's wrong, and we
understand than when we subtract all the illegal ballots, you can see that President
Trump actually won in a landslide.”

 On December 5, 2020, Respondent appeared on Justice with Judge Jeanine on Fox
News and stated, "We have over 500,000 votes [in Arizona] that were cast illegally . . .”

 On December 15, 2020, Respondent appeared on Greg Kelly Reports on Newsmax
and stated, “The proper and true victor, which is Donald Trump . . .”

 On December 22, 2020, Respondent stated on Twitter, through her handle
@JennaEllisEsq, “I spent an hour with @DanCaplis for an in-depth discussion about
President @realDonaldTrump's fight for election integrity, the overwhelming evidence
proving this was stolen, and why fact-finding and truth—not politics—matters!”

Respondent made these misrepresentations on Twitter and on various television programs,
including Fox Business, MSNBC, Fox News, and Newsmax.3
The parties agree that by making
these misrepresentations, Respondent violated Colo. RPC 8.4(c), which provides that it is ...


file:///C:/Users/weidn/Documents/2304-OPINION-APPROVING-STIPULATION-TO-DISCIPLINE-UNDER-C.R.C.P.-242.19c....pdf
 
oh ...


SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE BEFORE
THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE
1300 BROADWAY, SUITE 250
DENVER, CO 80203
___________________________________________________________________________
Complainant:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Respondent:
JENNA LYNN ELLIS, #44026
_______________________
Case Number:
23PDJ004
OPINION APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISCIPLINE UNDER C.R.C.P. 242.19(c)
////////////////////////

i dont have to lie or tell the truth
We have sworn testimony in a court of law made under the threat of perjury
 
How long until this becomes a forgotten footnote in the endless immaterial litigation the left has pushed to silence opposition?

A week? A month?
 
good question

I think it depends on the legacy of this suit.
Does Dominion collect damages for lost revenue ?

Will numbskulls ever course correct
or just morph into Roger Stone wannabes ?
 
Should American people collect damages from dominion? Their own workers said the code was **** and errors were frequent?
 
Should American people collect damages from dominion? Their own workers said the code was **** and errors were frequent?

sure, you can begin by filing a class action suit for damages today.

Have at it
//////////////////


I am loath to use this phrase, but here goes.
Tell me you don't know what this suit is about without saying you don't know what this suit is about
 
The suit is a nonsense defamation suit in the basis there was no wrongdoing. Problem is that we aren’t allowed to even check. And then there is discovery that showed the workers thought the code was **** and resulted in lots of errors.

So tell me you don’t know the whole case without telling me you don’t know the whole case.
 
But don’t worry 57. This time an allegation from the globalist establishment will come true. This time….
 
57 not a peep when Twitter colluded with the Govt to squash speech they didn’t like, probably supported it

But 57 cares very much about Fox running a campaign on ****ty voting machines for a private Corp dominion

And fell for a top gun spoof ad for fact.

Exactly all you should know about where his priorities lay.
 
I have no doubt 57 supports holding the Trump administration accountable for colluding with Twatter to squash speech. The issue is that you want to punish the guy who was a private citizen who asked twatter to take down Hunter Biden dick picks that violated twatters terms of service and was illegal in states with revenge porn laws. Personally I support the firing of Chris Wray for all of it. Dont you?
 
The suit is a nonsense defamation suit in the basis there was no wrongdoing. Problem is that we aren’t allowed to even check. And then there is discovery that showed the workers thought the code was **** and resulted in lots of errors.

So tell me you don’t know the whole case without telling me you don’t know the whole case.


No wrongdoing? We have texts showing Fox News hosts were reporting things about Dominion they knew were false. Disagreeing that those things were false kind of goes out the window when the defendant is admitting its a lie at the time. On top of that hosts like Hannity admitted in depositions they knew the claims were false. The claim about Dominion was never about errors from bad software, it was always about it deliberately changing the votes. You are grasping at straws with that. Fox is going to lose and lose big. I will actually be surprised if it actually gets all the way to a verdict. My guess is Fox settles for 500 million along with on air apologies by all the hosts involved and an agreement not to mention Dominion going forward. I would have thought a settlement would have come before the release of all this dirty laundry but they are insane if they think they are going to win this. Maybe they will use the threat of multiple appeals to get a settlement after the first guilty verdict.
 
Back
Top