Tapate50
Well-known member
That whole post is you patting yourself on the back saying my obsession is ok, but you do you. It will still be funny to me and most others.
2024 Field
- Thread starter Jaw
- Start date
That whole post is you patting yourself on the back saying my obsession is ok, but you do you. It will still be funny to me and most others.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Thats fine. Plenty of us laughing at you. I would be more concerned if you were complimenting me.
Tapate50
Well-known member
If it makes you feel better.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
It does.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
https://lawandcrime.com/lawsuit/fed...ocks-enforcement-of-florida-stop-w-o-k-e-act/
Yet another illegal DeSantis bill struck down by the courts. No doubt Sturg will be here any minute to criticize Meatball Ron for his illegal actions.
Yet another illegal DeSantis bill struck down by the courts. No doubt Sturg will be here any minute to criticize Meatball Ron for his illegal actions.
A bill like this being “struck down” helps desantis actually.
sturg33
I
If I show you polls that are favorable to DeSantis, what will your takeaway be?
I've seen them all - If any poll in Florida has it close where he has ultimate name recognition thats a massive issue for Desantis nationally.
And then when his positions on medicare and social security become fully understood its going to be a blowout.
You all know it deep down. Desantis had a bunch of people around him gas him up. He would have been much better off being the VP and then president. Now there is a world where ne never sniffs the white house.
sturg33
I
So to be clear.
Any poll that has DeSantis losing is bad news
And any poll that has him winning is expected.
By this logic, are you suggesting he is the front runner?
Look at trendlines in polling. Desantis is shedding support.
Show all you want - I love the debate with you.
I'm in line with protecting AMERICANS in an era where the global aristocracy has amassed untold amounts of wealth on the backs of sending jobs overseas to slave labor.
I think its a shame you are on the other side.
sturg33
I
You are protecting Americans with policy that are terrible, rob from them, and cannot be sustained.
In 20 years when there is no money, how are Americans protected?
Somebody has to fix this horrific policy
There is no money because of war mongers and globalists who have undercut american wages with unfettered illegal immigration. Oh, and then there is the fact the globalists are in lockstep with the CCP and have moved all our jobs to slave labor.
There is no way in the 21st century that any American is struggling.
sturg33
I
Actually there is no money because the programs themselves are out of money.
The government either needs to massively raise taxes to fund them, or cut benefits.
This is just math. Are you a math guy or not?
sturg33
I
Let's consult with openAI, shall we?
Social Security is a government program designed to provide income to retired, disabled, and surviving individuals. It is funded through payroll taxes, which means that workers pay into the program while they are employed, and then receive benefits when they retire or become disabled.
The reason Social Security is at risk in funding is that there are currently more people receiving benefits than there are workers paying into the program. This is due to a combination of factors, including longer life expectancies, lower birth rates, and the aging of the baby boomer generation.
As a result, the Social Security trust fund, which is used to pay benefits, is projected to run out of money in the next few decades. This means that either benefits will need to be reduced, payroll taxes will need to be increased, or some combination of the two will be necessary to sustain the program.
The exact solution to the funding problem is a matter of debate, but the important thing to understand is that the current demographic trends and the structure of the program make it difficult to sustain without changes.
---------------
Back to the humanoid...
On one hand, we have politicians who deny this reality... They have no plan, and when the funding runs out they will simply print the money. More inflation to **** over AMERICANS I'm told need protecting. These politicians are leftists, and Donald Trump
On the other hand there are operators who are able to diagnose legit problems and work towards solving them for sustainable success, or better yet, something substantially better! Privatizing retirement savings would result in so much more wealth than the current ponzi scheme.
I'm told that the second group of operators are bad, and cannot be elected, because they wish to solve this problem.
I'm told that the first group of politicians are the way forward... Because they adamantly believe in the failed policy and promise to double down on it
Social Security is a government program designed to provide income to retired, disabled, and surviving individuals. It is funded through payroll taxes, which means that workers pay into the program while they are employed, and then receive benefits when they retire or become disabled.
The reason Social Security is at risk in funding is that there are currently more people receiving benefits than there are workers paying into the program. This is due to a combination of factors, including longer life expectancies, lower birth rates, and the aging of the baby boomer generation.
As a result, the Social Security trust fund, which is used to pay benefits, is projected to run out of money in the next few decades. This means that either benefits will need to be reduced, payroll taxes will need to be increased, or some combination of the two will be necessary to sustain the program.
The exact solution to the funding problem is a matter of debate, but the important thing to understand is that the current demographic trends and the structure of the program make it difficult to sustain without changes.
---------------
Back to the humanoid...
On one hand, we have politicians who deny this reality... They have no plan, and when the funding runs out they will simply print the money. More inflation to **** over AMERICANS I'm told need protecting. These politicians are leftists, and Donald Trump
On the other hand there are operators who are able to diagnose legit problems and work towards solving them for sustainable success, or better yet, something substantially better! Privatizing retirement savings would result in so much more wealth than the current ponzi scheme.
I'm told that the second group of operators are bad, and cannot be elected, because they wish to solve this problem.
I'm told that the first group of politicians are the way forward... Because they adamantly believe in the failed policy and promise to double down on it
We should be using our tax revenues to help Americans and not fund wars.
We should not be allowing illegal immigrants to undercut wages for AMericans and then they send their money back to Mexico or Latin America.
We should not be allowing 'American Business Owners' to ship jobs to slave labor markets.
All those things happen then the program is not out of money.
So yes Sturg - I am a math guy and quite a good one.