2024 Field

Tapate50 said:
I think they do too but Trump as the nominee is going to turn them off from voting for him. They don't like him and even less people don't like to admit mistakes. Voting for Trump after voting for Biden is admitting a mistake.. And you are correct it has nothing to do with policy.

They won't hold their nose and pull the lever for Trump.
Click to expand...

I respectfully disagree. And the left will eat Desantis alive for his positions while he won't energize the rust belt because everyone knows his foreign/economic policy is cut from the same cloth as people like Romney/McCain.

Complete unelectable on a national level.
 
sturg33 said:
Is it your position that it would have been preferable for these 10,000 babies to be aborted, so that it may not make the dems motivated to retaliate in the future?
Click to expand...

Its my position that over the long term I want consistent restrictions on abortion.
 
thethe said:
Its my position that over the long term I want consistent restrictions on abortion.
Click to expand...

well I'm asking you directly... you appear to agree with Trump that Texas and Florida are too harsh on abortion.

So would you have preferred those 10k babies be sacrificed in order to maybe stop the Dems from wanting loosen those restrictions in the future?
 
thethe said:
I respectfully disagree. And the left will eat Desantis alive for his positions while he won't energize the rust belt because everyone knows his foreign/economic policy is cut from the same cloth as people like Romney/McCain.

Complete unelectable on a national level.
Click to expand...

You think people like admitting mistakes? Yikes. Status Quo wins in those situations. Its much easier to just stay with whats already here.
 
sturg33 said:
well I'm asking you directly... you appear to agree with Trump that Texas and Florida are too harsh on abortion.

So would you have preferred those 10k babies be sacrificed in order to maybe stop the Dems from wanting loosen those restrictions in the future?
Click to expand...

Its a non-sensical short sighted 'gotcha' question and you know it because you very clearly understand my position.

Do you think Lindsey Graham helped GOP candidates with his abortion messaging to the AMerican people?
 
Tapate50 said:
You think people like admitting mistakes? Yikes. Status Quo wins in those situations. Its much easier to just stay with whats already here.
Click to expand...

The difference here is that you're by yourself and nobody has to know what you choose.
 
thethe said:
Its a non-sensical short sighted 'gotcha' question and you know it because you very clearly understand my position.

Do you think Lindsey Graham helped GOP candidates with his abortion messaging to the AMerican people?
Click to expand...

You said the texas and Florida laws are short sighted.

At least 10k babies were spared due to that law.

So I'm asking you again... do you think it would have been better for that law not to have been so strict and result at least 10k more dead babies?
 
sturg33 said:
You said the texas and Florida laws are short sighted.

At least 10k babies were spared due to that law.

So I'm asking you again... do you think it would have been better for that law not to have been so strict and result at least 10k more dead babies?
Click to expand...

Do I think we are in a better world because 10K babies are alive? Obviously, but you know that and still resort to asking non-meaningful irrelevant questions that you know the answers too. Just like your constant 'In your own words' despite getting a response on multiple occasions.

But if you continue to just think in the present you'll always lose in the future.
 
thethe said:
Do I think we are in a better world because 10K babies are alive? Obviously, but you know that and still resort to asking non-meaningful irrelevant questions that you know the answers too. Just like your constant 'In your own words' despite getting a response on multiple occasions.

But if you continue to just think in the present you'll always lose in the future.
Click to expand...

I am actually thinking in the future and you are thinking in the past.

You are stuck in 2016. That was 7 years ago.

You won't answer this question because your position is indefensible. You cannot defend the indefensible. Your position is that we should destroy thousands of children today to hopefully one day save more in the future.

Trump has put you in a position of defending abortion.

He tends to that
 
sturg33 said:
I am actually thinking in the future and you are thinking in the past.

You are stuck in 2016. That was 7 years ago.

You won't answer this question because your position is indefensible. You cannot defend the indefensible. Your position is that we should destroy thousands of children today to hopefully one day save more in the future.

Trump has put you in a position of defending abortion.

He tends to that
Click to expand...

I did answer the question.

But as usual - Thoughts of a child and one that can't think in the future. If you think the avearge american wants strict restrictions on abortions then you do not understand how people think.
 
thethe said:
I did answer the question.

But as usual - Thoughts of a child and one that can't think in the future. If you think the avearge american wants strict restrictions on abortions then you do not understand how people think.
Click to expand...

You did not answer the question. And I know you won't. Because your position is indefensible.

Your position is very clear that you think we would save more babies long term if these ten thousand babies were killed today... and that the policy of saving these babies is a strategic mistake

Shameful
 
Tapate50 said:
Just like pre trump. It was 3 or 4 of y’all posting the same nonsense 24/7.

Anyway- you don’t want to hear it so it won’t help. I tried.
Click to expand...

sturg33 said:
When you can't defend the indefensible, it's easier to run away
Click to expand...

Tapate50 said:
This seems like the more likely issue at hand
Click to expand...

7sgj95.jpg


outside of the 3 of y'all, this board has lost every spectrum of people. I'm sure it's just a coincidence though lol
 
when you can't even defend your own opinions it's easier to run away... it is what it is... but nobody ever accused of being intelligent
 
sturg33 said:
when you can't even defend your own opinions it's easier to run away... it is what it is... but nobody ever accused of being intelligent
Click to expand...

always a good chuckle to **** up sentences when trying to call others dumb. an internet story as old as time

but yes, again, it's everyone else and not you in anyway shape or form lol
 
sturg33 said:
You did not answer the question. And I know you won't. Because your position is indefensible.

Your position is very clear that you think we would save more babies long term if these ten thousand babies were killed today... and that the policy of saving these babies is a strategic mistake

Shameful
Click to expand...

Completely dishonest form of debate:

Do I think we are in a better world because 10K babies are alive? Obviously
Click to expand...
 
goldfly said:
always a good chuckle to **** up sentences when trying to call others dumb. an internet story as old as time

but yes, again, it's everyone else and not you in anyway shape or form lol
Click to expand...

oh im sure im a part of it... making a fool of you all has to take its toll... better to just run away
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top