2024 Field

Of that 150m that also includes brands, duplicate accounts, the chopcountry account…

That interview must have been so good that people are watching it multiple times!
 
Keep in mind the Super Bowl draws a huge audience of children that Tucker Carlson isn’t pulling. So that would mean that Tucker/Trump is drawing a substantially higher % of adult viewers if “200m” is real
 
chop2chip said:
Keep in mind the Super Bowl draws a huge audience of children that Tucker Carlson isn’t pulling. So that would mean that Tucker/Trump is drawing a substantially higher % of adult viewers if “200m” is real
Click to expand...

What children have their own TV's?

Are you saying Nielson extrapolates based on average household size and not TV sets?

If anything as many children have twitter accounts as they do TV's....maybe more.
 
chop2chip said:
It’s more sophisticated than “average household size”, but to answer your question - yes.
Click to expand...

Great so even more reason to discount the total count or not only count “haircuts” for Twitter views.

Then of course the idea of who is actually watching versus how many tvs are on in the background.

Your twisting is revealing bud.
 
thethe said:
Great so even more reason to discount the total count or not only count “haircuts” for Twitter views.

Then of course the idea of who is actually watching versus how many tvs are on in the background.

Your twisting is revealing bud.
Click to expand...

How many unique people will watch this interview?
 
We have thethe claiming fake news on the number of Super Bowl watchers. Didn’t have that on my bingo card for the day, but here we are.
 
I'm still wanting to see any commentary of the interview

what did they talk about it?

it just gonna be another "polls" situation where we brag about view counts but nobody cares about the substance?
 
chop2chip said:
We have thethe claiming fake news on the number of Super Bowl watchers. Didn’t have that on my bingo card for the day, but here we are.
Click to expand...

I never said fake news - I'm just pointing out that you're coming out with haircuts (valid mind you) for twitter views, a portion of which can apply to SB views.

But of course, you didn't decide to do that.

I can only wonder why.....
 
sturg33 said:
I'm still wanting to see any commentary of the interview

what did they talk about it?

it just gonna be another "polls" situation where we brag about view counts but nobody cares about the substance?
Click to expand...

As if people don't know Trumps positions or don't realize that he's released volumes of policy videos.

You just don't care about that of course.
 
thethe said:
As if people don't know Trumps positions or don't realize that he's released volumes of policy videos.

You just don't care about that of course.
Click to expand...

so what was the point of the interview then?

did tucker push him on his covid policies or his failed election success? did they talk about flipping states that were lost and how to do it?
 
sturg33 said:
so what was the point of the interview then?

did tucker push him on his covid policies or his failed election success? did they talk about flipping states that were lost and how to do it?
Click to expand...

To stick it to Fox News of course - Figured you would have figured that out by now. Why else start at 8:55?
 
thethe said:
To stick it to Fox News of course - Figured you would have figured that out by now. Why else start at 8:55?
Click to expand...

oh. well if that's the case the 213 billion people will watch it are going to be disappointed to hear the same ol whining we always get
 
sturg33 said:
oh. well if that's the case the 213 billion people will watch it are going to be disappointed to hear the same ol whining we always get
Click to expand...

People decide - I know that bothers you. It is what it is.

One thing I know, the clip of Desantis checking to see if its ok to raise his hand won't do him any favors. What a leader!!
 
thethe said:
I never said fake news - I'm just pointing out that you're coming out with haircuts (valid mind you) for twitter views, a portion of which can apply to SB views.

But of course, you didn't decide to do that.

I can only wonder why.....
Click to expand...

Clearly bringing up the Super Bowl was to frame how insane those view numbers were. Nothing in the US comes close to pulling an audience like that does.(but FWIW, advertisers have contracts with Fox that guarantee X amount of viewers so there’s at least a degree of accountability for Nielsen’s to get a reasonable accurate estimate — Twitter and Trump has every incentive to inflate viewership).
 
chop2chip said:
Clearly bringing up the Super Bowl was to frame how insane those view numbers were. Nothing in the US comes close to pulling an audience like that does.(but FWIW, advertisers have contracts with Fox that guarantee X amount of viewers so there’s at least a degree of accountability for Nielsen’s to get a reasonable accurate estimate — Twitter and Trump has every incentive to inflate viewership).
Click to expand...

I know exactly what you were doing - but you know exactly what you were doing by assuming massive haircuts for Twitter (again - I agree with your methdology) and assuming the reported number for the SB IS the number
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top