Search results

I don’t think it’s an overpay considering it’s 1 year. Healthy and 2.5-3 wins and it’s well worth it

$20m for a single year?? That’s incredible

bravesfanSally

Exactly, when you whine about literally everything you’re bound to be right eventually. Maybe it’s alcohol that makes some emotional idk

Wouldn’t call myself a bootlicker but was good with the Murphy trade at the time. It was indeed a miss.

We already knew he’d miss time…..how drunk are you? It’s Sunday afternoon…

You can find enough ABs for both Murphy and Baldwin. I think I’d rather pay Kim $20m a year for the next three years than give up some valuable near-major league ready players to pay Seager $30+ over the next six.

Whoa, is this THE ChapelHillMatt?

Depends on what Kim wants. If it’s $15m it’s a no-brainer for me. But I think Boras is holding out for more. My gut says he’ll be back.

No idea if he can play SS. I don’t love hitters like him.

You just don’t understand leverage or something

Yeah I really don’t want to watch AA do sex…that sex tape would have negative value in my book.

Negative value doesn’t mean negative value, you absolute dense moron.

Yes, it is definitely my fault that you said something you apparently didn’t mean lol. Do whatever you feel you need to do in order to make yourself feel better for being wrong. No harm to me. But it still has zero bearing on you being wrong here.

…players don’t have leverage in a free agent market? Again, complete and total nonsense. Your brain is a pretzel.

Sure, if that makes you feel better I guess. Can you answer the question I’ve asked a bunch of times?

What you’re saying is complete nonsense.

Could Murphy fetch a 40 prospect or not? Have you answered that question yet?

Twisting themselves into pretzels to somehow claim Murphy has negative trade value due to his 3/$45 contract. Wild.

Yes, teams famously don’t need players during free agency.