Search results

No, I’m very clearly disagreeing with the “us good” part.

There, see how easy that was? Us good, them bad, therefore we can do whatever we want. No need to bother with silly math.

The amount of money spent by Denmark and the economic output of Greenland have nothing to do with whether or not we should perform a hostile takeover. If they don’t want to do it, there’s no amount of dumbass math you can spit out that will make it less immoral if we take it by force. You have...

lol, why even bother with these stupid fucking justifications? If you’re cool with America taking things from peaceful nations because it has the bigger guns, just stop with the theatrics. You don’t need these convoluted arguments, you can simply embrace your new position of America can do...

lol, this guy

I genuinely cannot imagine how deeply and violently angry these people would be Joe Biden announced he was going to give direct cash handouts to everyone just for funsies and that Congress can’t stop him.

This is about the person who is legal. You have no knowledge of the relationship between him and the people they’re seeking to deport but you’ve apparently landed at the conclusion that he must be guilty of something simply because the government arrested him for not showing his papers.

The information we have is that a citizen was falsely arrested by immigration officers for not showing his papers and hauled out into the cold in his underwear, and the government justifying it because they were looking for two other people. The information that doesn’t exist is any evidence of...

Do we know he was doing this? Could just a poor person living with other people?

You sure did, we’re all very proud of you. But I’m not in the mood to craft a mock deportation policy for your amusement today.

Then nothing is a subsidy?

Showing ourselves to be an even less reliable ally by expanding into their territory does not help us in that scenario and instead isolates us on the world stage.

This may be hard to believe, but some world leaders don’t want to escalate tensions.

I’m not saying no spending, I’m saying less by not spending it on things like the defense of Europe or dropping bombs in the Middle East and Venezuela.

We could simply vote for people who wouldn’t spend our tax dollars on this.

No, I’m aware of the reality of territorial governance in the modern world. But I think once we start saying things like “we need our own Taiwan” we’ve lost the plot.

Can you show me the instances of Sharia law in western Europe?

I don’t know how else to say this, this is simply Nazi shit.

We have a military alliance and privileges in Greenland already to stop this from happening. We’ve had endless success on the “stop the CCP from taking Greenland” plan before this.

So *we* must continue to defend Europe then?