The only point I made was that it seems we could have gotten Lewis instead of Anderson.
I don't buy the "would cost more at 3" argument. He signed for $3.2m... we could have definitively offered him more than that, so why wouldn't he have signed? If he wasn't willing to go back to school to get more than the $3.2M, why would have gone back to get more than $4m? (ignoring that there would be even less upside reward in doing it)
He has more leverage at #3, now I'm not saying he breaks the bank, but I think he gets more money the higher he goes in the draft, that seems like common sense to me.