Yeah, I've been seeing this re-posted on facebook by my friends whom are Ron Paul guys.
In what developed nation with socialized healthcare, is the government forcing doctors to perform a practice or treat someone without their consent?
I would love to be shown cases of this and improve my understanding on this. Wouldn't socialized healthcare just be covering the costs, so doctors would still be getting paid either way?
I honestly would rather see socialized healthcare, than see people try to get sympathy on gofundme to fund surgeries and health procedures.
As Julio eluded to, government (tax payers) fund a lot of basic things as it is. Education (public schools), Law Enforcement (Police), Civic Leadership (Elected Officials), Transportation (Roads, Buses, etc).
Why wouldn't basic healthcare be one of those things?
Always interested to know why conservatives feel we should still be interpreting the constitution as if it's 1776, not 2016. Jefferson actually wanted the constitution to be scrapped and reformed every once in a while to be modernized.
There is just so many things we have now that the fathers never had to deal with that definitely makes the constitution look outdated.
And I love the basic premise of the constitution, but there should absolutely be some room for modernization.
I could just interpret the "right to life, liberty, and happiness" as life being afforded to live healthy.
In what developed nation with socialized healthcare, is the government forcing doctors to perform a practice or treat someone without their consent?
I would love to be shown cases of this and improve my understanding on this. Wouldn't socialized healthcare just be covering the costs, so doctors would still be getting paid either way?
I honestly would rather see socialized healthcare, than see people try to get sympathy on gofundme to fund surgeries and health procedures.
As Julio eluded to, government (tax payers) fund a lot of basic things as it is. Education (public schools), Law Enforcement (Police), Civic Leadership (Elected Officials), Transportation (Roads, Buses, etc).
Why wouldn't basic healthcare be one of those things?
Always interested to know why conservatives feel we should still be interpreting the constitution as if it's 1776, not 2016. Jefferson actually wanted the constitution to be scrapped and reformed every once in a while to be modernized.
There is just so many things we have now that the fathers never had to deal with that definitely makes the constitution look outdated.
And I love the basic premise of the constitution, but there should absolutely be some room for modernization.
I could just interpret the "right to life, liberty, and happiness" as life being afforded to live healthy.