Tapate50
Well-known member
You're right, the Braves killed it this trade deadline.
I don't think you know how "winners and losers" columns work.
You're right, the Braves killed it this trade deadline.
This is a pretty large over-exaggeration, imo. The Yankees acquired 8 of the following prospects this deadline:
Clint Frazier - the headliner of their deadline acquisitions. Similar to Swanson in value at the time we traded for him. Unlikely we would have gotten him for anyone on our roster aside from maybe Vizcaino, but even that is a reach as they may have preferred Miller to Viz.
Gleyber Torres - a nice piece for sure, but more projection at this point than actual production. Similar value to Newcomb or Wisler at the time of their trades.
Justice Sheffield - a lefty with projection, but he is pretty short, which questions his long term potential to stay as a starter. Blair would be a similar comp, but I think Blair held quite a bit more value at the time of his trade.
Dillon Tate - Touki 2.0. Million dollar arm, but quite a ways away and struggling pretty bad currently. At least we didn't give up anything valuable for Touki, unlike the Yaknees did for Tate.
Billy McKinney - a decent hitting prospect having a rough year. Projects for average power but good contact and on base skills. Not much of a defender and projected for LF. Bat likely doesn't carry as a LFer. Probably drops out of the Top 100 in the next issue.
Heller, Crawford, and Feyereisen are fringe guys, though I do like Heller's potential as a high leverage reliever. But RP prospects are hardly worth mentioning.
I'm sorry, but those 8 compare nothing to:
Folty, Wisler, Inciarte, Swanson, Blair, Jenkins, Touki, Newcomb, Ruiz, both Petersons, Mallex, Jenkins, Gant, Fried, Whalen, and Demerritte. I'm sure I'm even missing some more. Several of these guys are already making an impact on the major league roster and pretty much all of them have gained value since the trade (sans Blair and Wisler).
Question for those bemoaning the Braves' inactivity at the deadline, what would you have accepted for Teheran? My guess is the offers were something like Devers and Owens from the Red Sox and Gallo from the Rangers. Do you guys make those deals?
Question for those bemoaning the Braves' inactivity at the deadline, what would you have accepted for Teheran? My guess is the offers were something like Devers and Owens from the Red Sox and Gallo from the Rangers. Do you guys make those deals?
I find it impossible to believe that in a market where Moore got Duffy the Braves couldn't get a 3-4 WAR position player with 5+ years of control for Teheran.
It is very hard to make those decisions based on pure speculation. I am not a fan of Gallo. I think it is clear that guys like Moncada and Bregman were never an option though.
I find it impossible to believe that in a market where Moore got Duffy the Braves couldn't get a 3-4 WAR position player with 5+ years of control for Teheran.
Hopefully in the next week some of the offers on the table for Julio will start to surface and we can argue about it for days.
It is very hard to make those decisions based on pure speculation. I am not a fan of Gallo. I think it is clear that guys like Moncada and Bregman were never an option though.
I find it impossible to believe that in a market where Moore got Duffy the Braves couldn't get a 3-4 WAR position player with 5+ years of control for Teheran.
Hopefully in the next week some of the offers on the table for Julio will start to surface and we can argue about it for days.
Who are those players? You're basically describing a really good player who has just begun playing in the majors. Who is giving that up?
Who are those players? You're basically describing a really good player who has just begun playing in the majors. Who is giving that up?
I would have strongly considered the Matt Moore package for JT. Considering JT is better, he likely would have gotten a better offer, no?
What about Duffy is that enticing? He was good last year, but his underlying offensive numbers weren't that impressive and he's regressed this year. That would have been a seriously underwhelming return.I would have strongly considered the Moore package for JT. Considering JT is better, he likely would have gotten a better offer, no?
MLBTR considers the Yanks top 3 now, they did an excellent job:
Yankee fan
4:09 Should I be upset or happy with what happened during trade period?
Steve Adams
4:10 The Yankees are being universally lauded as having one of the top three farms in the game now, and really all that happened was you traded two guys that were going to be free agents and an amazing reliever. I'd be thrilled. Yankees weren't making the playoffs anyway.
And for as good as Miller is, he's still a pitcher -- and a reliever no less... the most volatile commodity in the game.
That would have been a terrible deal. Duffy is a mid-ceiling guy and Santos and Fox are light years away.
What about Duffy is that enticing? He was good last year, but his underlying offensive numbers weren't that impressive and he's regressed this year. That would have been a seriously underwhelming return.
Duffy is prollyna 4 WAR player per year. Great defender with solid bat. I could see him being somewhere between a better defensive prado and a Matt Carpenter. Hes batted ball profile (launch angle) profiles among the best hitters in game (carpenter/murphy for example). How many 25 year olds have a 5 WAR season?
Would you trade Kyle Seager for JT, i would?'
He's undoubtedly a league average bat with mediocre plate discipline and limited power. He's a good defender, but I'm not trading my best trade piece for 10 DRS.
I would trade JT for Kyle Seager. Kyle Seager is also not available.