2018 Offseason And Targets

Status
Not open for further replies.
My plan this offseason would be to use our resources to build our depth as best we can while adding an impact bat somewhere along the way. I've been convinced that we shouldn't pour any significant resources into our rotation or bullpen. I think we can make some minor moves in the bullpen, but nothing significant. Our resources need to be spent offensively. We should target a catcher, a corner outfielder, and a utility option for the bench. I think the ideal offseason for us would be:

Signing Marwin to a little over what Escobar got. Maybe 3 years at 28 million or 4 years at 35 million. Something like that, if it would get it done. He'd be a wonderful addition to our depth and would allow us to get really creative with how we deploy our lineup.

Signing Grandal to a 4 year 70-80 million dollar deal or something in that ballpark.

Trading for an impact corner outfielder. My first choice would be Eddie Rosario, but given that we have no indications of the Twins going into sell mode I think Peralta is the guy that makes the most sense here. Both Grandal and Peralta would qualify as impact additions to our starting lineup while Marwin would be an enormous addition to our bench. I think it'd take our bench from being pretty awful to being pretty good immediately. We saw how valuable a good bench is during the Dodgers series.

All of this would add ~35 million to our payroll and leave us plenty of room for any minor deals we wanted to make or any midseason transactions we wanted to complete. The only deal that I'm even slightly reluctant on is the Grandal deal, but in the end I'd be comfortable with 4 years. No more, though.
 
Yeah I thought about that after I posted it. I forgot about Dansby.

I'm certainly not denying we need help offensively. I just don't think catcher is where it needs to be. Much rather upgrade LF and/or 3b.
 
Carp said:
Yeah I thought about that after I posted it. I forgot about Dansby.

I'm certainly not denying we need help offensively. I just don't think catcher is where it needs to be. Much rather upgrade LF and/or 3b.
Click to expand...

But 3B was fine with the emergence of Camargo... yes I can see the argument upgrading to have Camargo as a super utility guy but upgrading 3B isn't going to move the needle a ton offensively... but a big time Catcher will move the needle quite a bit unless you think Zuk and Flowers will keep outplaying their potential... and even if they do its still not near the level as Realmuto or Grandal...

And even if you do upgrade with one of those two at catcher, we still have plenty of resources to get another utility infielder, a starting LFer, and a back up OFer
 
I’m in for the idea of Marwin, Grandal, and one of Rosario/Peralta. That’ll be done in the neighborhood of 35 million. And if that did happen our team would be in excellent shape for a deep postseason run for the foreseeable future and leave us around 10 million to use at the deadline or get a couple of cheap guys.
 
BeanieAntics said:
My plan this offseason would be to use our resources to build our depth as best we can while adding an impact bat somewhere along the way. I've been convinced that we shouldn't pour any significant resources into our rotation or bullpen. I think we can make some minor moves in the bullpen, but nothing significant. Our resources need to be spent offensively. We should target a catcher, a corner outfielder, and a utility option for the bench. I think the ideal offseason for us would be:

Signing Marwin to a little over what Escobar got. Maybe 3 years at 28 million or 4 years at 35 million. Something like that, if it would get it done. He'd be a wonderful addition to our depth and would allow us to get really creative with how we deploy our lineup.

Signing Grandal to a 4 year 70-80 million dollar deal or something in that ballpark.

Trading for an impact corner outfielder. My first choice would be Eddie Rosario, but given that we have no indications of the Twins going into sell mode I think Peralta is the guy that makes the most sense here. Both Grandal and Peralta would qualify as impact additions to our starting lineup while Marwin would be an enormous addition to our bench. I think it'd take our bench from being pretty awful to being pretty good immediately. We saw how valuable a good bench is during the Dodgers series.

All of this would add ~35 million to our payroll and leave us plenty of room for any minor deals we wanted to make or any midseason transactions we wanted to complete. The only deal that I'm even slightly reluctant on is the Grandal deal, but in the end I'd be comfortable with 4 years. No more, though.
Click to expand...


I've been big on Gonzalez for awhile, but I'm not so sure Johan can't be our version of Marwin if you put him in that role. What it would boil down to for me is - would Riley/Haniger/Camargo be as good offensively as Camargo/Peralta/Gonzalez over the next 3 years and would you push all your chips in to have Paxton and Folty at the top of the rotation for that period? In either case you add Grandal, but which one of those projects to more wins otherwise?

The vast majority of us agree talking about a pitching "surplus" is ridiculous to a point - but if AA doesn't start moving some of these arms this winter, he's going to start wasting tons of value since some of these guys are going to start taking steps back or start getting hurt. I just don't see how he'll ever be in a better position to overpay for the pieces that may push us over the top.
 
bravesfanMatt said:
Hmm. He might be intriguing. Need to see how staffs faired under his control.
Click to expand...

Price was the Seattle Mariners pitching coach from 2001–2006. Price earned USA Today Baseball Weekly 's Pitching Coach of the Year Award in 2001 after leading that staff to the American League ERA title with a 3.54 mark, an improvement of almost one run per game from the previous season

Price was the Arizona Diamondbacks pitching coach until May 7, 2009, when he resigned after manager Bob Melvin was replaced by A. J. Hinch. Price was named Major League Coach of the Year by Baseball America in 2007 after his Diamondbacks staff posted a 4.13 ERA, fourth best in the National League, on the way to the National League Championship Series. He also worked for the Philadelphia Phillies as a minor league consultant
 
How teachable is something like pitch framing? It seems like something one could really improve on if they focused on it. Doesn't seem like one of those skills that you either have it or you don't. But I know very little about being s catcher so I may be wrong.
 
Carp said:
How is it not true? Each position was above average offensively. That's a true statement.
Click to expand...

Above average yes but there's plenty of room for improvement.

Catcher, LF/RF wherever Acuna plays, and maybe 3B are spots we should upgrade. Maybe SS depending who is available.
 
clvclv said:
The vast majority of us agree talking about a pitching "surplus" is ridiculous to a point - but if AA doesn't start moving some of these arms this winter, he's going to start wasting tons of value since some of these guys are going to start taking steps back or start getting hurt. I just don't see how he'll ever be in a better position to overpay for the pieces that may push us over the top.
Click to expand...

Not sure i'd go all-in so to speak but do agree if AA is gonna make some trades, now is the time. As said, lot of our trade chips value is falling or is never gonna be higher, cant prospect hoard forever.
 
I guess I don’t really understand the rational for committing 8 million aav years to a utility player (Marwin).

Or do you folks expect him to be the starting LF?

I’d rather sign a 3B short term and use Camargo in that role.
 
Southcack77 said:
I guess I don’t really understand the rational for committing 8 million aav years to a utility player (Marwin).

Or do you folks expect him to be the starting LF?

I’d rather sign a 3B short term and use Camargo in that role.
Click to expand...

whatever he is called I would expect him to get 400+ PAs if we signed him...he's gotten over 500 with the Astros the past 3 seasons...if it helps we can call him the starting third baseman and Camargo the utility player...both will play a lot
 
Southcack77 said:
I guess I don’t really understand the rational for committing 8 million aav years to a utility player (Marwin).

Or do you folks expect him to be the starting LF?

I’d rather sign a 3B short term and use Camargo in that role.
Click to expand...

To be honest, there's never been any indication (that I've seen) that the thought of playing Camargo on the grass has ever been discussed other than by us on this board. I don't think anyone thinks it's a terrible idea, but if AA and/or Snit have had that thought you'd think someone would've seen it mentioned somewhere other than here.

They'd also likely have asked him to go somewhere for winter ball and try it for a few weeks = expecting him to transition smoothly playing some out there during camp is probably a little much.
 
Last edited:
Grandal is very good and can hit lh. I want him over Realmuto. He’s not a better player but I’d rather not pay his price. I hope the bad Octobers hold him to a 4 year deal.

I’d love for us to land moose if he’d take a one year plus team option. Play him vs rh and comargo vs lh. Camargo fill in other spots vs rh.

Big trade will be for an of.

I could see a one stop shopping in Pitt for cerveli and an of. I just don’t think Pitt will sell early.
 
nsacpi said:
whatever he is called I would expect him to get 400+ PAs if we signed him...he's gotten over 500 with the Astros the past 3 seasons...if it helps we can call him the starting third baseman and Camargo the utility player...both will play a lot
Click to expand...

I guess my question is what’s so great about Gonzalez getting 400 plate appearances at 8 million dollars aav?

He’s slightly above average hitter with no real split advantage.

That’s a super expensive bench bat.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top