Horsehide Harry
<B>Mr. Free Trade</B>
Freeman is signed through his age 31 season at very reasonable rates. There is very little chance the Braves are paying for much decline...as long as they don't do something stupid with an extension.
Given the pretty poor returns from the prospects acquired in the tear down, it's pretty dumb to wish the same FO responsible for those mediocre prospect returns would have also been in charge of selling Freeman.
Well, there is that. But that fits into the thinking that they weren't smart enough nor courageous enough to consider moving Freeman to begin with, the same malady that led them to completely waste whatever value Teheran might have had.
There's always the possibility that they make a Freeman trade into a Tex trade (have to have a ML 1B in return regardless of whether he is any good) or become the Marlins FO. Obviously, my thinking has always been based upon the idea that they would get an excellent return back for Freeman when they traded him. I understand that a perceived front end win can often turn into a long term loss (that risk is why you don't want to let your team get into the position of having to rebuild in the first place).
Freeman's value was completely wasted until 2018. It made no on the field difference of any substance whether he was there or not. The team was going to be bad. In fact, a strong argument can be made that having him there improving the record by 2-4 wins above where it would have been had he not been there was a detriment to the rebuild.
Essentially, IMO, and I've said it many times before, the rebuild was very badly handled. It may still work out ok anyway. But as it looks right now, given the payroll situation, I think any high water mark will be short lived with a most likely outcome of becoming a purgatory team for an extended period - not bad enough to fire everyone and rebuild again, not good enough to be really good enough to win anything beyond an occasional luck fueled WC or Division.