Horsehide Harry
<B>Mr. Free Trade</B>
Trading Ender has always made a tremendous amount of sense IF the FO had signed or traded for 2 legit cOF (and Markakis can't be one of them). If they had signed McCutchen and Brantley at similar AAV of what they got, instead of sitting on their asses and settling for Markakis, they could have then had the flexibility to trade Ender either as part of a JTR move, as part of a Kluber move, or as a stand alone move designed to re-stock the prospects somewhat after a different move sent some prospects away. They could have picked up a Matt Holiday for the bench and occasional OF duty for $1.5M, kept Duvall as your primary 4th OF.
But that would have taken a PLAN going into the offseason, one I don't think the Braves had outside of stay within a flat budget, try to grab some bargain plays that you hope will pay off, pray that the young guys miraculously develop (which would be 2 years in a row it happens which would be like throwing 7's back to back (it could happen but the odds are against it)) and do just enough slight of hand to keep fans interested and away from the man behind the green curtain.
You could have had:
LF Brantley
CF Acuna
RF McCutchen
1B Freeman
2B Albies
SS Swanson
3B Donaldson
C McCann/Flowers OR JTR assuming that you trade for him.
Then you either trade Inciarte as part of the JTR trade or to Cleveland for one of their starters (let's say Kluber) or to Cleveland for prospects, or to some other team in need of a CF. Worst case, you trade him along with Teheran to move Teheran's money even at a diminished prospect return for Inciarte.
Sure, Acuna's defense isn't Inciarte level. But, it wouldn't have to be with two legit OF on either side of him. AND, for nuance, his lack of comparative defense in CF would diminish his WAR from where it would be in RF or LF which should impact his cost a bit over the years.
Keeping Inciarte was a lazy move borne out of a lack of imagination.
But that would have taken a PLAN going into the offseason, one I don't think the Braves had outside of stay within a flat budget, try to grab some bargain plays that you hope will pay off, pray that the young guys miraculously develop (which would be 2 years in a row it happens which would be like throwing 7's back to back (it could happen but the odds are against it)) and do just enough slight of hand to keep fans interested and away from the man behind the green curtain.
You could have had:
LF Brantley
CF Acuna
RF McCutchen
1B Freeman
2B Albies
SS Swanson
3B Donaldson
C McCann/Flowers OR JTR assuming that you trade for him.
Then you either trade Inciarte as part of the JTR trade or to Cleveland for one of their starters (let's say Kluber) or to Cleveland for prospects, or to some other team in need of a CF. Worst case, you trade him along with Teheran to move Teheran's money even at a diminished prospect return for Inciarte.
Sure, Acuna's defense isn't Inciarte level. But, it wouldn't have to be with two legit OF on either side of him. AND, for nuance, his lack of comparative defense in CF would diminish his WAR from where it would be in RF or LF which should impact his cost a bit over the years.
Keeping Inciarte was a lazy move borne out of a lack of imagination.
Last edited: