2020 Field

thethe said:
Democrats are going to jump at the chance to dump Biden.
Click to expand...


No they will ride this bandwagon off the cliff then blame the people who refused to vote for him....its 2016 all over again. When a candidate wants to consolidate support from all the candidates I think it's a good idea to adopt anything that literally all of them agree on except Biden. His refusal to do so is a slap in the face.
 
https://www.dataforprogress.org/blo...na-is-incredibly-popular-with-marginal-voters




Here is good data on support for legalized marijuana by consistent voters, marginal voters, and non voters. They defined them as a consistent voter having voted in the last w elections. Marginal voter having voted in 1 of the last 2. Non voters as having not voted in the last 2 elections.



Overall consistent voters slightly lean against legalization but its 2 to 1 in favor of legalization by consistent voters who are Democrats. Among marginal or non voters both in general or just Democrats all these groups support legalization by more than 2 to 1.


I think there is a large mostly untapped voter bloc that is big enough to swing the election. I still believe if Hillary was strongly in favor we would be hearing fox news losing its mind right now over 5k deaths from the coronavirus right now instead of them defending 50k deaths.
 
Democrats are desperate to drop Biden.

Only question is what mechanism exists to replace him at this point?
 
they have asked

“It is untrue,” said Mr. Biden spokeswoman Kate Bedingfield. “This absolutely did not happen.”
 
sturg33 said:
Why do you suppose they havent?
Click to expand...

I don't believe he's been doing many interviews. But he should be asked.

Since he was a Senator when this happened and it involved a staffer, wouldn't the Senate have jurisdiction over this? Or does it not apply when someone is no longer a Senator. Maybe something for Lindsay Graham to check out.

But the people who will have to ultimately decide are the voters. We all have a responsibility to try to learn and weigh the facts and make the best judgment we can. It happened in 2016 and it will happen again in 2020.
 
nsacpi said:
I don't believe he's been doing many interviews. But he should be asked.

Since he was a Senator when this happened and it involved a staffer, wouldn't the Senate have jurisdiction over this? Or does it not apply when someone is no longer a Senator. Maybe something for Lindsay Graham to check out.

But the people who will have to ultimately decide are the voters. We all have a responsibility to try to learn and weigh the facts and make the best judgment we can. It happened in 2016 and it will happen again in 2020.
Click to expand...

I'm curious what VP candidate Kamela Harris will have to say after her consistent and loud assessments of Kavanaugh.

Weirdly, she has been quiet on thos one.

I suppose metoo was just a political sham per usual
 
I never really thought much of the political metro stuff, I didn't want Kavenaugh but it had nothing to do with allegations from when he was in high school, Unless there is clear evidence and its current I'm not interested,
 
Abrams narrowly lost a pretty sketchy Gubernatorial election (the runoff rule in Georgia is so anti-democratic...).

That said, it still doesn't look good on her resume to be on the ticket if she couldn't win the Gubernatorial. The only way it makes sense, is, I think this time around, her name recognition in Georgia could put the Dems over the top in both of the US Senate seats up for grabs this year. Since Georgia is slowly becoming a purple state despite the voter suppression tactics by the State GOP, it could make sense for her. I think if she ran in one of the Senate elections she'd win easily.

I personally wouldn't want her on the ticket. If Michelle Obama were on the ticket, that would be pretty much game over for Trump's re-election.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top