2020 Field

It’d be weird for him to tweet that 13 months ago just to set up that picture now.

I didnt say he did that. Im just saying if you think the flag he posted is not right out of the box recently then youre atupid.
 
I didnt say he did that. Im just saying if you think the flag he posted is not right out of the box recently then youre atupid.

But if he does genuinely have a pride flag on his office door typically, does it really ****ing matter if that specific flag is new?
 
But if he does genuinely have a pride flag on his office door typically, does it really ****ing matter if that specific flag is new?

Why wouldnt he have the one that was given to him of it was such an important cause to him?
 
Why wouldnt he have the one that was given to him of it was such an important cause to him?

Which flag are you claiming was given to him? If you accept he hangs a Pride Flag on his office door, I have absolutely no idea what your point is.
 
Why wouldnt he have the one that was given to him of it was such an important cause to him?

Did he say he was given a pride flag by Ru Paul? Nope. Just that he hangs it out "365 days" so anyway, carry on, trumpettes go find something else to be outraged by.
 
That's the guy who said he'd nuke Americans if they didnt surrender their.guns, right?

No, he said to someone in a thread, (someone who's twitter handle is rambobiggs, lol) that if you started a war with the government you wouldn't have a shot because they have nukes. And he's not wrong. 2nd amendment doesn't protect the average citizen from the "US Government" because the reality is if they wanted to kill you and end an insurrection, we have drones that can drop bunker busting bombs that you won't even see coming. He's just effectively pointing out the stupidity of that particular argument.

For context to those who don't know

"So basically @RepSwalwell wants a war," Biggs tweeted. "Because that's what you would get. You're outta your f—ing mind if you think I'll give up my rights and give the gov all the power."

"And it would be a short war my friend," Swalwell responded. "The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they're legit. I'm sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities."

If you want to see more high quality tweets from rambobiggs

"Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahha......hhahahahahaahaha omg dude. Cut the jokes. You couldn’t win in a popularity contest vs. AIDS, Nickelback and ISIS. You’re a punk. Stfu and go back to your wife who pegs you. She even calls you a bitch"

"You say dumber things. You are literally the dumbest human being ever."

"**** John McCain! He was a horrible human being. You’re a dirt ball Ben."

"Shut up poccadumbass."

All those and more high quality posts are less than 24 hours old.
 
Posting the exchange where a sitting member of congress suggested that the government would nuke it's citizens if they resisted giving up their guns does not help your case.
 
Nope, again

"And it would be a short war my friend," Swalwell responded. "The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they're legit. I'm sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities."

Stop being obtuse. Or would it be more effective to get my point across if I posted in caps FAKE NEWS
 
Posting the exchange where a sitting member of congress suggested that the government would nuke it's citizens if they resisted giving up their guns does not help your case.

Pointing out that armed insurrection against the government would end badly is worse than insisting that people should be armed so they can engage in armed insurrection against the government?
 
The nuke point is stupid. Really should have just said "The government will handle it the same way they deal with all armed criminals who refuse lawful orders"
 
Pointing out that armed insurrection against the government would end badly is worse than insisting that people should be armed so they can engage in armed insurrection against the government?

Suggesting that the government could and would use nukes on its citizens was the troublesome part. This isn't a message board poster it's a person running for President, who just happens to be a D bc D has lost their minds.
 
Suggesting that the government could and would use nukes on its citizens was the troublesome part. This isn't a message board poster it's a person running for President, who just happens to be a D bc D has lost their minds.

TO be fair, there's a clear historical implication that someone who creates insurrection against the US Government is no longer a US Citizen. Civil War already gives you a blueprint on how the Federal Government can crush insurrection. Lots of innocent civilians were killed in the Civil War.
 
2nd amendment people are weird

they say they need guns for the 2nd amendment but then get out of shape when someone with a gun shoots at gov't people and cops etc.

it's like some catch 22 that they don't understand that those are the people the 2nd amendment was written for



but on topic, seriously even ****ty as Biden is better than the threat to our democracy we have in power now. so, the stance is still the same, every single person running is a better choice than what we have now
 
Back
Top