Don't forget she will have to explain to the American people why she lied about Bidens mental health for years.
2024 Field
- Thread starter Jaw
- Start date
Don't forget she will have to explain to the American people why she lied about Bidens mental health for years.
Runnin
Well-known member
Really? When will this happen?
Most people understand completely how age creeps up on people.
Oh sure - Biden was a mentally competant person till the debate with Trump.
Of course a ****ing idiot like you would think these things.
Fortunately, the American people know Biden has been a vegetable for years and Harris lied about it every time she was asked.
This will be the peak of Kamals polling throughout the cycle.
She is in a lot of trouble.
The entire administration and the entire Dem party said he was fine literally the same week of the debate. They deal with him on a daily basis, so you would think they would know.
Then the debate happens and they all magically change their minds....
Problem is us normal people have contend with ****ing retards like Runnin who will vote blindly for Harris.
It is what it is.
acesfull86
Well-known member
Mindlessness runs both ways… see post #4142
http://www.chopcountry.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7833&page=208
Tariffs are needed when markets are artificially manipulated.
Meh - I get the argument that many have made on this but the 'not working' bit was sourced from polls which were temporary in nature.
Still love the changes though.
That’s not the only example, man. We’ve hit a point of such extreme polarization that people don’t look at policies so much as they look at politicians. Another recent example was Harris getting on board with Trump’s tip tax proposal. I’d love to get to a point where more overlap existed between the parties. Right now voting (D) or (R) means voting on about 1,000 different positions and it’s largely binary.
I agree with Sturg that the messaging could be better.
https://www.joshbarro.com/p/i-said-democrats-should-pander-more?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
This is not far off from my views on how these economic policies might shake out politically. I disagree with Barro on whether or not it’s good for Harris to do this, but I think it could be more popular than conservatives are going to give it credit for being.
This is not far off from my views on how these economic policies might shake out politically. I disagree with Barro on whether or not it’s good for Harris to do this, but I think it could be more popular than conservatives are going to give it credit for being.
Ecomically there are grounds for compromise but culturally the overton window between thetwo parties is quite large.
She’s never once been in a position to dictate policy though, and many voters will recognize that. Again, I actually agree with Barris (and presumably you) that these aren’t effective policies. But I think you’re looking at this from the perspective of someone who is somewhat plugged in to her electoral history and voting record. Most aren’t in that position.
Nobody will buy it especially as it appears two of hte most recent policy pronouncements were direct copies off of what Trump and team have stated.
The only thing this 'convergence' will do is reiterate to the population that Trumps policies are the right ones so I hope Kamala continues to do so.
Further, Kamala is on record talking about EQUITY (Not equality) and thats an easy thing to attack.