2024 Field

Oh I see. That's amazing specific.

We have had no innovation since the 20th century for sure, which is why we've need big daddy government to keep spending more to protect us, I guess.

Glad to hear you're on board with the party that we need not concern ourselves with spending and size of government anymore

Sprinting left

There is nothing specific because you're an idiot anjd don't understand the sheer weight of the debt crisis. If you think that a reduction of spending does anything then you're just an idiot.

Case closed.
 
I mean - You still think that these people are more popular or reach more people.

Its hard to react in any other way but LOL.

What type of support do you think poeople like Bush/Romney have right now? It would be such a joke of a presidential run.

I suppose I'll ask you again but what part of what I posted is wrong?

9/10 other presidential candidates this century were more popular among the voters than Donald Trump.

You can laugh. You can dismiss. But I like to live in reality while you have your delusions
 
I suppose I'll ask you again but what part of what I posted is wrong?

9/10 other presidential candidates this century were more popular among the voters than Donald Trump.

You can laugh. You can dismiss. But I like to live in reality while you have your delusions

You live in a small world where you don't actually understand what you're looking at. But I would expect nothing less from a 'sales guy'.
 
There is nothing specific because you're an idiot anjd don't understand the sheer weight of the debt crisis. If you think that a reduction of spending does anything then you're just an idiot.

Case closed.

Have we not had any innovation over the last 120 years or so?
 
You live in a small world where you don't actually understand what you're looking at. But I would expect nothing less from a 'sales guy'.

Alright you got me ill ask yet again.

What is WRONG about the data I posted?

I actually respect math guys, by the way.

Good ones, I mean
 
There is nothing specific because you're an idiot anjd don't understand the sheer weight of the debt crisis. If you think that a reduction of spending does anything then you're just an idiot.

Case closed.

If the US government cut $1T in spending.

We would stop adding interest to our debt.

We would gain confidence with our creditors

We would stop adding to inflation

We would eliminate 20% of useless government, which gets in the way of innovation.

Can you let Javier Milei know he should stop his spending cuts as they make no difference?
 
As I recall y'all claim to be fiscal conservatives but want to defund the IRS. That's pretty nifty. I guess being on the side of tax cheaters is more important than bringing down debt, inflation and interest rates.
 
As I recall y'all claim to be fiscal conservatives but want to defund the IRS. That's pretty nifty. I guess being on the side of tax cheaters is more important than bringing down debt, inflation and interest rates.

Money doesn't belong to the government. It belongs to the people.

I want the people to keep as much as they possibly can, ideally 100%

The easiest solution to do that is cut ridiculous spending on **** that doesn't work

This one made me laugh

[tw]1810647818991780071[/tw]

I assume 57 and nsacpi both were educated in a world with no department of education. perhaps that's a sign we actually do need it...
 
Javier Milei elected in December, where inflation was 25%

He drastically cut spending and fired half the cabinet

They produced a budget surplus in April

Inflation down to 4.2% in June

Did all that without any theoretical innovation, too

GQEkKV4WsAAggU6
 
The RNC policy agenda that thethe is touting as amazing, says he will "end inflation"

how does he plan to accomplish this?

(something about mass deportations I'm sure)

“Mass deportations” has become for MAGA what “make the rich pay their fair share” is for (D)
 
Last edited:
Money doesn't belong to the government. It belongs to the people.

I want the people to keep as much as they possibly can, ideally 100%

The easiest solution to do that is cut ridiculous spending on **** that doesn't work

This one made me laugh

[tw]1810647818991780071[/tw]

I assume 57 and nsacpi both were educated in a world with no department of education. perhaps that's a sign we actually do need it...

Education is mainly a local responsibility in this country. The federal government plays a smaller but still important role. We can get rid of the Department of Education and nothing will change. The federal government role will continue but will be performed from within another agency. One candidate may have dementia. The other three are playing a shell game. I guess some of y'all have a weakness for shell games of this sort. Libertarians seem especially fond of this game. I'm disappointed that they seem to put the performative over the substantial. If they had the courage of their convictions they would advocate for an end to the federal government's role in education. Our educational results are not good enough. Turn education over to the private sector. That's what I would expect from an actual for real Libertarian. Not shell games.
 
Last edited:
MAGA has nothing interesting or insightful to say about the economy or the debt crisis.

Tell me Aces - how do you solve the debt crisis through spending cuts?

you guys just regugitate teh same textbook related answers that have little to do with the current global economy and use short timelines to dismiss anything else.

You guys are unoriginal.
 
[tw]1810704963661635634[/tw]

I'M SHOCKED!

Only have been saying this for months as everyone tries to pretend that anybody but Biden beats Trump.

The reality is Biden beats anyone NOT NAMED Trump.

"IT'S A TRAP!!!"
 
[tw]1810704963661635634[/tw]

I'M SHOCKED!

Only have been saying this for months as everyone tries to pretend that anybody but Biden beats Trump.

The reality is Biden beats anyone NOT NAMED Trump.

"IT'S A TRAP!!!"

I’m not rejecting your premise here, but it’s worth noting that comparing the party’s nominee to a bunch of people not running for President is at best an inexact science.
 
I’m not rejecting your premise here, but it’s worth noting that comparing the party’s nominee to a bunch of people not running for President is at best an inexact science.

Agreed - They are getting the benefit of not having to show how awful they are (Harris/Mayor Pete/etc...) People like Berne/HRC/Gore have os much name recongition that the figures above are pretty much in line iwth their country level support. The others would most likely have even worse numbers once voters became more familiar with them.

I'm actually shocked at how stupid the Democrat party is (well I guess I'm not) for demanding Biden step down. They are writing their own death sentence because anyone else and you're looking at a +60-80 seat majority in the House and +6-8 in Senate without him on the ticket. Might get that in the Senate either way though.
 
Last edited:
For what its worth - I still don't understand why Amy Klob doesn't get more of a voice in party. Out of anyone they've ran the past 10 years (HRC exluded but she is just pure evil) she is the most sane and reasonable.
 
[tw]1810711294435033328[/tw]

After being called a nut on this forum for years one of the most consequential men of the last 100 years is basically now saying all the same things I've said since November 2020.

Anyone with reasonable math skills could tell you that 2020 was stolen. And its been happening for even longer. The left was just fortunate that Repubicans run unpopular toast candidates so they never needed to steal at the level they needed to stop Trump in 2020.

But yeah - You guys know better. 2020 was free and fair.

Romeny is more popular than Trump!!
 
Back
Top