2024 Field

sturg33 said:
Is trunp winning all that we care about?

I thought the GA senate story might be a warning. But nah. Kari Lake it is!
Click to expand...

Some Republicans want to play dirty - it’s the nature of the game as Trump ruined so many of their livelihoods.

It’s not going to stop the train from leaving th station for the traditional republicans for good. Harris is so far behind that she’s talking about owning guns and shooting intruders. I’m ok with taking some lumps along the way.
 
Ahh.

8 years of trunp running the party and we have to keep giving up seats everywhere in order to get those price caps and government funded health care

What a win (for the left)
 
Great footage of the Felon displaying his political genius.

[video=youtube;EeZCcZeCFkU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeZCcZeCFkU[/video]

"We have to cherish him. It's like a fine wine, because that's what you have. You have a fine wine. He's an outstanding person and I've gotten to know him so well...and fairly quickly..." LMMFAO
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Garmel said:
Well, we had a better alternative in RDS but he's not here to vote for now.

Yes, there is a big difference between Kamala and Trump.

Don't let perfection be the enemy of good.
Click to expand...

If I could sign for a scenario where (R) controls Congress and Harris wins the election, I would. There’s no evidence she has the political savvy to navigate such a scenario. Congress wouldn’t let her get anything done, forcing her to resort to unconstitutional executive action like her boss, which would be slapped down by the one branch of the federal government that still actually does its job. In the meantime, hopefully, mercifully, (R) could get past Donald Trump. My only fear in this scenario is we’d have to listen to years of how Trump was robbed yet again, and his 35% diehards would nominate him again as an 82 year old in the next cycle.
 
acesfull86 said:
If I could sign for a scenario where (R) controls Congress and Harris wins the election, I would. There’s no evidence she has the political savvy to navigate such a scenario. Congress wouldn’t let her get anything done, forcing her to resort to unconstitutional executive action like her boss, which would be slapped down by the one branch of the federal government that still actually does its job. In the meantime, hopefully, mercifully, (R) could get past Donald Trump. My only fear in this scenario is we’d have to listen to years of how Trump was robbed yet again, and his 35% diehards would nominate him again as an 82 year old in the next cycle.
Click to expand...

Good chance you will be granted your wishes. Gridlock could be a good thang.
 
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump said Thursday in back-to-back speeches that he would hold Jewish voters responsible if he loses the Nov. 5 election, suggesting that they owe him their support because of his position on Israel and questioning the sanity of Jewish Democrats.

“The Jewish people would have a lot to do with a loss,” Trump said at a summit on fighting antisemitism in America. “It’s only because of the Democrat hold, or curse, on you.”

He made similar remarks later in the evening at the Israeli American Council National Summit. Both events took place in Washington, D.C.

Trump did not take questions at either event and did not address the new report that a Republican gubernatorial nominee he has personally boosted, Mark Robinson of North Carolina, once described himself as a “black Nazi” on an internet pornography forum.

https://wapo.st/4ev3owi

Why is he singling Jews out to scapegoat for his difficulties. To their credit many gentiles will also be voting against him.
 
Whether they were involved or not shouldn't we destroy their lives? That's how this works, right?

[tw]1837108305350525102[/tw]
 
acesfull86 said:
If I could sign for a scenario where (R) controls Congress and Harris wins the election, I would. There’s no evidence she has the political savvy to navigate such a scenario. Congress wouldn’t let her get anything done, forcing her to resort to unconstitutional executive action like her boss, which would be slapped down by the one branch of the federal government that still actually does its job. In the meantime, hopefully, mercifully, (R) could get past Donald Trump. My only fear in this scenario is we’d have to listen to years of how Trump was robbed yet again, and his 35% diehards would nominate him again as an 82 year old in the next cycle.
Click to expand...

This is the scenario that would cause the least of amount of damage
 
Does look like maga is starting to turn on itself. A good thang for the GOP, conservatism and the country.

[tw]1836851630425211021[/tw]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top