2024 Field

I've been listening to the Trump-Carlson interview for shizz and giggles.

I don't know what's more funny/impressive, the fact Trump continues to repeat his talking points with such confidence because he knows his freedom is riding on it, or Tucker putting on a straight face and openly sucking up to him when we know how Tucker actually feels and thinks about Trump behind the scenes lol.

Trump needs Tucker to allow him a safe space and big audience to spew his propaganda. Tucker needs Trump's viewers for a possible future run and to keep his viewership high.

Was CNN townhall with Kaitlin Collins a 'safe space'?
 
Lol... I never disappeared I just don't live over here like you do... I actually have a life outside of this board.

Fortunately for me I'm paid a lot of money to sit in front of a computer and I'm really fast.

Happy to compare life/accomplishments with you at any time....
 
Vivek can get away with it because like Trump in 2015, he doesn't have a voting record in government on anything for his colleagues to attack him on.

He's a blank slate and can sort of yell at whatever direction the wind is blowing.

I doubt most of the GOP voter base even knew who he was before last night (and likely most still dont).

I don't mind Vivek. Seems like a more level headed Trump. I do feel like he's putting on a show more than anything. But I guess maybe that's all politics is anymore is a show.
 
[tw]1694750938601255328[/tw]

Forget about 2020 guys! Not important at all.

"We are here to **** **** up"
 
Was CNN townhall with Kaitlin Collins a 'safe space'?

lol at thinking CNN is a place where Trump is going to break a sweat.

CNN loves Trump for his ratings. And Kaitlin Collins built a rapport with Trump when she was White House correspondent (he called on her a lot during pressers and questions in the front lawn of the white house). She is the CNN equivalent of Maggie Haberman at NYT. They know they are liked by Trump more than other reporters, so they push sometimes on things Trump can appear to fight back at so both sides look like they're coming out tough, but Haberman is basically an outlet for Trump to get his stuff in via the NYT. All they care about is access. During Mueller and covid, nobody had more "exclusive" interviews with Trump outside of Fox News, than Maggie Haberman.

Tucker didn't challenge Trump on anything. The closest he came was asking him if he thought Epstein really killed himself and what was Barr talking about. The rest was playing nice and feeding into Trump's ego. He couldn't have gotten a more softball interview if he wanted other than sit down with Hannity. Tucker asks Donald a question, Donald answers however he wants and Tucker more or less shakes his head in agreement and doesn't challenge him. Hannity gives Trump a leading question that's already formulated to make Trump look good, and all Donald does is agree and expound on it to make him look more sophisticated.

The people in Trump's base who don't know about Tucker's texts and emails trashing Trump behind the scenes, are not watching CNN regularly, and probably weren't even watching the CNN Townhall. Those same people for sure are on facebook and twitter watching the Tucker interview today.
 
lol at thinking CNN is a place where Trump is going to break a sweat.

CNN loves Trump for his ratings. And Kaitlin Collins built a rapport with Trump when she was White House correspondent (he called on her a lot during pressers and questions in the front lawn of the white house). She is the CNN equivalent of Maggie Haberman at NYT. They know they are liked by Trump more than other reporters, so they push sometimes on things Trump can appear to fight back at so both sides look like they're coming out tough, but Haberman is basically an outlet for Trump to get his stuff in via the NYT.

Tucker didn't challenge Trump on anything. The closest he came was asking him if he thought Epstein really killed himself and what was Barr talking about. The rest was playing nice and feeding into Trump's ego. He couldn't have gotten a more softball interview if he wanted other than sit down with Hannity. Tucker asks Donald a question, Donald answers however he wants and Tucker more or less shakes his head in agreement and doesn't challenge him. Hannity gives Trump a leading question that's already formulated to make Trump look good, and all Donald does is agree and expound on it to make him look more sophisticated.

The people in Trump's base who don't know about Tucker's texts and emails trashing Trump behind the scenes, are not watching CNN regularly, and probably weren't even watching the CNN Townhall. Those same people for sure are on facebook and twitter watching the Tucker interview today.

Ok - If you aren't considering going onto CNN anything to write home about can you name me the politician that does anything but 'softball' interviews?
 
[tw]1694750938601255328[/tw]

Forget about 2020 guys! Not important at all.

"We are here to **** **** up"

You guys do understand what this means right?

Or is this another conspiracy theory that you'll pretend doesn't exist and laugh when someone says the 2020 election was stolen?

Democrats were smart. They knew the Establishment Republicans don't have a spine and would allow them to run out the clock.

There is no amount of vitriol that Trump can direct towards Kemp that isn't warranted. Kemp could have put an end to this immediately by calling a special session when it was obvious Fulton County stole GA in 2020.
 
You guys do understand what this means right?

Or is this another conspiracy theory that you'll pretend doesn't exist and laugh when someone says the 2020 election was stolen?

Democrats were smart. They knew the Establishment Republicans don't have a spine and would allow them to run out the clock.

There is no amount of vitriol that Trump can direct towards Kemp that isn't warranted. Kemp could have put an end to this immediately by calling a special session when it was obvious Fulton County stole GA in 2020.

Can you link to the FOIA request?
 
Can you link to the FOIA request?

Now you don't think Paul Sperry knows what he is doing?

Have you been paying attention the last 6 years when he was years ahead of everyone on things like Russian Collusion and IMpeachment?

Its really pathetic Sturg.
 
That's a weird response. I clicked the tweet to read it. Didn't see any links. Do you have it?

When they post the FOIA I'll provide it - I know that Paul Sperry is someone that can be trusted. Just like Techno Fog.

You used to know these things but NOW "you want to see it for yourself".
 
When they post the FOIA I'll provide it - I know that Paul Sperry is someone that can be trusted. Just like Techno Fog.

You used to know these things but NOW "you want to see it for yourself".

You'll have to forgive me for not blindly accepting whatever comes down the pike of truth social this morning.

If Bannon confirms it I'll be sold
 
You'll have to forgive me for not blindly accepting whatever comes down the pike of truth social this morning.

If Bannon confirms it I'll be sold

It was on twitter actually - But I know when truth comes out on the election it makes your idiotic arguments look even more idiotic so you've decided to not acknowledge it anymore.

TRUMP LOST! TRUMP CAN'T WIN!

Fool
 
It was on twitter actually - But I know when truth comes out on the election it makes your idiotic arguments look even more idiotic so you've decided to not acknowledge it anymore.

TRUMP LOST! TRUMP CAN'T WIN!

Fool

I think it's reasonable to ask for the evidence of what he is saying rather than simply reciting it as a fact

Apologies that that is so offensive to you
 
I think it's reasonable to ask for the evidence of what he is saying rather than simply reciting it as a fact

Apologies that that is so offensive to you

Weird you never asked for 'evidence' back in late 2020 and during 2021 when you were SURE the election was stolen.

Now you want it - I know Sturg. I know.
 
Weird you never asked for 'evidence' back in late 2020 and during 2021 when you were SURE the election was stolen.

Now you want it - I know Sturg. I know.

Lol dude I'm not even saying it's wrong. I genuinely wanted to read it.

You made two posts about it so I clicked on tweet and looked for the FOIA records he cites but there is none.

I then asked you for it and you're getting all hissy about it.

I assume this exists somewhere on the internet if it is a FOIA request... why don't you want it? It will probably really help his court argument
 
Lol dude I'm not even saying it's wrong. I genuinely wanted to read it.

You made two posts about it so I clicked on tweet and looked for the FOIA records he cites but there is none.

I then asked you for it and you're getting all hissy about it.

I assume this exists somewhere on the internet if it is a FOIA request... why don't you want it? It will probably really help his court argument

I shared the post because its someone that I know has been DEAD ACCURATE about government corruption for the last 6 years. Do you disagree with that?

If you aren't consciously aware of just how much you've changed then I'm not sure what else to tell you.
 
I shared the post because its someone that I know has been DEAD ACCURATE about government corruption for the last 6 years. Do you disagree with that?

If you aren't consciously aware of just how much you've changed then I'm not sure what else to tell you.

Well you posted almost two hours ago. I asked for the link 20 min ago. You've posted several times yelling at me for asking for the link rather than just posting the source.

When 57 posts that GA passed Jim crow 2.0 law, I asked for evidence of that. Is that wrong of me to do?
 
Back
Top