2024 Field

You shouldn't feel the need to prove it to me, and I don't care at all.

You have conviction that the soros guy is going to finish 2nd. Put your money where your mouth it. We will send it to charity of your choice

“Soros guy”

I admit you never said “shill” but seems pretty close eh?
 
1994 - Republicans gained 54 seats
2002 - Republcians gained 2 seats
2010 - Republicans gained 63 seats
2018 - Democrats gained 41 seats
2022 - Republicans gained 9 seats

2002 republicans got the 9/11 boost to avoid losing share


so taking a look at the above... what i see is a woeful 2022 performance considering we were facing record inflation and one of the most unpopular presidents of all time

You still don’t get it eh? Tell me what the composition of the house was prior to those elections.
 
sure close enough but that appears to be making a tongue in cheek jab at you for not being so disgusted with his soros linkage.

I never said one thjng either way about Vivek. I only said it’s clear he would surpass RDS eventually. This was when he was polling at 1-2% he’s doing considerably better since I said that right?
 
Is it easier to win a higher number of seats if there are 300 that are flippable or 200?

Man I wish you had warned me about the medicore toss up house that was so obvious... back in the day, you and I agreed very closely it was going to be a landslide slaughter for the GOP

[tw]1573887166165536769[/tw]

Week before election day all polls will show minimum +5 R's

Going to be a landslide.

All state positions in the southwest are up for grabs and I think people are going to be shocked how competitive a lot of Cali will be.


[tw]1576914003603107841[/tw]

Slight amendment - INTENTIONALLY undercounting the MAGA candidates.

Its going to be an absolute devastating landslide because we now have our eyes on the election process.

Globalists completely blindsided us with the COVID rules and in reality it was our fault for not being ready for a heightened level of cheating that we've come to just expect from the left.



Here you are today excusing away the letdown by informing it was too much stacked against. Seems weird to me
 
Excusing? We talking about your comment of “historical underperformance”

It’s cute when you try to change topics when it’s clear you are about to be shown to be wrong.

But if literally everyone predicted a gop wipeout and things like voting machines go down in Election Day in high republicans areas and the. Republicans don’t crush it like they were expected it would make a normal person wonder what happened.
 
Excusing? We talking about your comment of “historical underperformance”

It’s cute when you try to change topics when it’s clear you are about to be shown to be wrong.

But if literally everyone predicted a gop wipeout and things like voting machines go down in Election Day in high republicans areas and the. Republicans don’t crush it like they were expected it would make a normal person wonder what happened.

It was a historical underperformance and you've posted nothing to refute that.

I have posted the data.

It's tough being a cultists because you have defend made up delusions instead of reality
 
It was a historical underperformance and you've posted nothing to refute that.

I have posted the data.

It's tough being a cultists because you have defend made up delusions instead of reality

And you’ve ignored my question….conveniently.
 
I reviewed your post and you didn't pose a question after the "excusing?"

You are stating that it was historically low performance for first mid term election and using raw seat gain as your metric.

Then I said to you is it easier to gain more seats if you are have 240+ to get or 210?

I'm still waiting for your answer.
 
You are stating that it was historically low performance for first mid term election and using raw seat gain as your metric.

Then I said to you is it easier to gain more seats if you are have 240+ to get or 210?

I'm still waiting for your answer.

I genuinely don't understand the question.

All 435 seats were up for elections and dems very narrowly lost the majority.
 
I genuinely don't understand the question.

All 435 seats were up for elections and dems very narrowly lost the majority.

Winning a seat you previously controlled does nothing for the "Amount of seats gained" (<----This is your metric to determine "Historical Underperformance")

So still....I'm waiting on an answer.
 
1994 - Republicans gained 54 seats
2002 - Republcians gained 2 seats
2010 - Republicans gained 63 seats
2018 - Democrats gained 41 seats
2022 - Republicans gained 9 seats

2002 republicans got the 9/11 boost to avoid losing share


so taking a look at the above... what i see is a woeful 2022 performance considering we were facing record inflation and one of the most unpopular presidents of all time

In case you forgot that this was the metric you are using as support for "historical underperformance"
 
Back
Top