Tapate50
Well-known member
This is why we can't have nuthin'
Joel BenensonVerified account @benensonj 1h1 hour ago
Dubious story from @SecPriceMD re: small biz laying off 3 of 18 workers b/c of health costs. Sm biz
This is why we can't have nuthin'
Joel BenensonVerified account @benensonj 1h1 hour ago
Dubious story from @SecPriceMD re: small biz laying off 3 of 18 workers b/c of health costs. Sm biz
Wow.
Your post assumes that employers are subject to the minimum requirement won't still offer benefits.
So those same costs directly affect employers of all sizes.
This is why some people report increases of over 75%
All the more reason to decouple health insurance from employment.
Under 50 employees the owner not required or expected to provide HC. Employees are eligible for exchanges.
Health insurance is not the reason this person has to let go of 3 workers.
This has been law for 5 or 6 ears and y'all still don't understand.
79%
Health care in this country continues to be an unmitigated, embarrassing disaster. Farce of a bill. Nobody should support it.
Duh, let's make the government pay for it. Because their track record of product innovation, efficiency, and cost optimization is unparalleled!
It irritates me how dumb you are.
This business owner doesn't HAVE to provide health insurance. But he did bc he wanted to give his employees a nice benefit.
Costs have gotten too high... she he can either stop giving all 18 employees HC, or he can reduce his staff by 3.
He chose the second.
Following?
The employment-based system is working great, then?
You raise a reasonable point about subsidies raising costs, btw. I would be interested to know, though, if you could provide a functioning example of a system without subsidies?
you are exactly right, he doesn't HAVE to provide HC.
Sec Price has either found or created a business man with a heart of gold ?
Why not let all 18 get involved with the exchanges -- no one loses their job and he can buy iPhones for everyone.
Instead of Health Care
Agreed. We the voters were promised a counter plan and all we got was an amendment.
Because if he does that it would be a huge pay cut to his employees.
And is this the first thing you were promised by the new president and/or Congress that he/they haven't delivered on? You'll note that I have not posted much on this, I have not been one of those blasting him/them for every little thing, but so far the president has backed out on his promise to make Mexico pay for the wall, or build it at all for that matter, AND to make drug companies compete with Canada, which all good capitalists claim to cream themselves for, and now the new health care bill SEEMS to be less than we were promised.
Your thoughts, to this point?
I don't see the wall as a broken promise yet. Trump said many times the payment would not necessarily be in the form of a cash payment. I just want the wall.
It's disheartening to see the plan that was rolled out to replace the ACA that's for sure