Antifa
- Thread starter sturg33
- Start date
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
It already has happened here. What do you think the war on drugs is? Just because black/minorities arent the only ones suffering does not make it any different. Jews were not the only ones that suffered from Nazi oppression. The war on drugs propaganda is no different than the propaganda against the Jews. I know what your saying.... " but drug users broke the law". Yeah, so did many Jews and it wasnt laws made by Hitler either. Many of the laws used to oppress Jews were made by local elected officials. Theres also the fact we are bombing about 8 countries and have invaded/occupied several countries largely to secure resources to maintain our status as THE world power. Choosing the head Nazi every 4 years doesnt make the actions any better.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
I wish they couldn't. I wish Nazism was banned and there was free reign to punch Nazis. Nazis are the worst and should be treated as such. They're actual subhuman.
sturg33
I
Picking a choosing which speech we will allow is far more dangerous than letting a bunch of losers circle jerk and shout a few hours a month
Do you feel the same way about those that espouse communism?
57Brave
Well-known member
My reading tells me Z never questioned Nazi's having the right to speak, it is just he thinks they should be punched after they speak ---- for what they say.
Free speech isn't what is at issue.
...............
Same with that Milo guy. People just don't want to clean up the mess after they say what they have to say.
That is kinda the 2nd half of free speech ----
If their speech is so important get up on a soap box and speak -- then deal with the repurcussions of what it is the free speaker says.
2 different issues
Free speech isn't what is at issue.
...............
Same with that Milo guy. People just don't want to clean up the mess after they say what they have to say.
That is kinda the 2nd half of free speech ----
If their speech is so important get up on a soap box and speak -- then deal with the repurcussions of what it is the free speaker says.
2 different issues
sturg33
I
If you think that people should be allowed to assault people based on what they say, then you don't believe in free speech.
This is quite simple
57Brave
Well-known member
where did I say I thought someone should be allowed to assault
there are laws against assault
by the same token, one is free, within the law, to say whatever one wishes to say.
The law does not compel others to provide the soap box for the speaker to stand --
.........................
however once spoken the speaker is responsible for the words he/she speaks
............................................................................................................
Liberal logic. The person who speaks is responsible for physical assault if someone attacks him for speaking his mind
Tapate50
Well-known member
Wow. On so many levels
This is what the media has done.
THE HORROR!!!
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
noted that you don't care about actual fake news being spread to the orange ones disciples
That is precisely what I said.
57Brave
Well-known member
We had 8 cases of cited violence in yesterdays Tigers- Yankees game.
25 man rosters means 50 players.
8 ejections for fighting. For every 6.25 players 1 was ejected.
As opposed to 33 cited out of 40,000.
Is the American League a violent entity that should be denounced or labeled a terrorist organization ?
While Miggy was trying to exercise his 1st ammendment rights he was sucker punched by a Yankee.
25 man rosters means 50 players.
8 ejections for fighting. For every 6.25 players 1 was ejected.
As opposed to 33 cited out of 40,000.
Is the American League a violent entity that should be denounced or labeled a terrorist organization ?
While Miggy was trying to exercise his 1st ammendment rights he was sucker punched by a Yankee.
Tapate50
Well-known member
Wow.
sturg33
I
Watch that video above and continue to defend these losers