April

nsacpi

Expects Yuge Games
On the last day of April, our record stands at 10 wins and 11 loses. Compared with most projections, this is a little better than expected. Let's take a look a who has outperformed expectations and who has underperformed so far.

1) I'll start with our star players, Freeman and Simmons. Both came into 2015 after 2014 seasons that were a bit below their prior benchmarks. I have previously made the point that a reasonable 2015 projection for those two would be something between their 2013 and 2014 seasons. Simmons so far is closer to his 2013 offensive numbers, with a .693 OPS (versus .617 in 2014 and .692 in 2013). His defensive metrics are also more along the lines of his better numbers from 2013. Freeman's offensive numbers are also closer to his 2013 numbers, with a .883 OPS so far this year (.897 in 2013 and .847 in 2014). Imo, these two are performing pretty close to expectations. It is nice to see some early confirmation that 2014 were off-years for both.

2) Two off-season signings have significantly outperformed projections. Pierzynski is on a pace for a 5.5 WAR season, which would be his career best by a large margin. Obviously some regression (make that a lot of regression) is coming here, with the .372 BABIP being one indication. However, AJ has also put up a very impressive 3.8% strikeout rate so far, so not all of his great start is smoke and mirrors. Markakis has put up an .822 OPS so far, about a hundred points above projections. A .391 BABIP has helped, and points to some significant regression. His walk rate so far is 15.9%, which would be a career high.

4) Our veteran platoons in left (Gomes and KJ) and third (Callaspo and CJ) have been palatable. As with Freeman and Simmons, I thought CJ would rebound to something between his 2013 and 2014 offensive numbers. So far his has put up a .721 OPS (versus .653 in 2014 and .816 in 2013). Collectively, these four players are matching expectations.

5) Jace Peterson's .584 OPS so far is slightly below what the projection systems had for him at the start of the season. I'm less taken by Peterson than others around here but think he will improve slightly on his April numbers going forward.

6) Center continues to be our most problematic position. Here regression implies an improved performance going forward from Maybin (.167 BABIP) and Young (.213 BABIP). We have some options on the farm (Cunningham, Perez, Smith, Lipka) so one way or another we should see better productivity out of center during the rest of the season.

To summarize the state of play among position players: Regression is likely reduce the production we get in right and at catcher, but should increase our production out of center.

Among starting pitchers, Teheran has underperformed a lot, Wood a bit, and Miller has been about as expected. I'm talking here about FIP relative to projected FIP. Miller has benefited from a .219 BABIP and Wood has been hurt by a .341 BABIP.

As for the other two rotation spots and the pen, I think the inconsistency and generally low production is about what we should have expected and that more of the same is likely for the rest of the season. I'm more positive on Cahill than most around here and think he should be given another 4-5 starts.

Assuming that Teheran isn't carrying an injury that will affect him the rest of the year, I think we are likely to get a bit more from our pitching going forward, which will about offset the regression likely to occur on the offensive side.

Overall our record in April slightly flatters relative to our underlying talent. Our run differential so far is -5. Brewers and Phillies are at -47 and -40, so things could be worse.
 
Thought we should have a thread for some of the more pleasant aspects of the team.

Hitting

Asshole - .422 .442 .689 1.131 - What more can you say? Has had a decent amount of playing time and turned it into an excellent month.

KJ - .267 .327 .511 .838 - Had a really rough start and turned it on late. Good month.

Markakis - .338 .443 .378 .822 - Looks great at the plate. Really seems to know what he's doing, and he looks like the best hitter on the team.

A few other positives without the flashy numbers, but with promise - Simmons, Gomes, and CJ.

Pitching

Miller - 3-0, 2.05 ERA, 1.09 WHIP, .192 .284 .269 .553 (against) - Right there at the top of the list of pleasant positives. The guy looks great so far.

Martin - 1-0, 2.84 ERA, 1.11 WHIP, .227 .300 .409 .709 (against), 11.37 K_9 - His first bad outing happened recently and skewed the numbers a bit, but he has been our best option out of the pen so far. Fantastic command, and an incredible K_9 rate with his velocity. My favorite player, and a huge pleasant positive.

Cunniff - 1-0, 2.00 ERA, 0.78 WHIP, .038 .212 .038 .251 (against) - Nothing exactly jumps out at you when you're watching him, but no one seems to hit him hard AT ALL. Pretty amazing start to the year. Right there with Martin as one of our best options out of the pen.

Grilli - 0-1, 7/8 SV, 4.50 ERA, 1.00 WHIP, .172 .250 .345 .595 (against), 14.63 K_9 - Like Martin, he had his first bad outing recently, but that doesn't change how effective he's been as Kimbrel's replacement. Another huge pleasant positive.

A couple recent additions with promise - Kohn and Thomas.
 
I think Jace has looked great out there with a few too many boneheaded rookie moments, especially recently.
 
I wanted to focus on positives, and he has some negatives that have been discussed elsewhere. I didn't see the need to rehash them here.

That's silly... he's been really good this year - and still really unlucky. Dude is crushing everything
 
That's silly... he's been really good this year - and still really unlucky. Dude is crushing everything

It makes sense to discuss it in this thread, and if I had just posted in Nsacpi's, I would've mentioned him. His numbers have rebounded nicely late this month, but his attitude stinks. He's going to be a problem if it keeps up, but I think Chipper will probably stop by and jerk a knot in his tail and put an end to it.
 
We lost a total of almost 5 wins from Freeman, Simmons and CJ going from 2013 to 2014. Imo a good assessment of what we were likely to get from those 3 in 2015 should have been a key factor in determining what we should have done in the off-season. I was always on the relatively optimistic side in thinking they were likely to be closer to their 2013 productivity this year. The 2013 versions of Freeman and Simmons are a very good foundation for any team and will likely keep us close to .500 even with the very weak supporting cast we currently have.
 
Back
Top