Only R’s care about this talking point. Incumbents running uncontested should be a norm that’s done away with. D’s were never given a choice on their candidate.
As I see the echos in all of right-wing media about democracy being under attack, I’m going to henceforth only respond to any such argument with ‘lol’. You can’t say he has dementia and that he should stay in the race. Don’t go back and pretend you weren’t calling for the 25th Amendment for the past month non-stop.
Then they need to invoke the 25th
Sure, whatever man. I won’t object if they do.
like why would anyone? It’s a full admission
[tw]1815094227531083971[/tw]
This is why I think Harris as the replacement is a non-starter. While I doubt any would-be voter will care about the primary process once the ticket is set, I do think this is an effective political talking point that will be shouted from the rooftops.
What's the right-wing excuse now when Harris beats Trump?
I don’t think it matters. If you are a voter that’s knowledgeable enough about the primary process then that person is probably not an undecided voter. I think these elections are ultimately decided on who is better at driving turnout.
I’d be surprised if Kamala wins. No one (on either side) likes her much. Maybe she drives AA and women turnout. I guess?
Checking in doe a sneak peak of 57's post tomorrow
[Tw]1815135964978729432[/tw]
Sounds like Manchin wants in. If the dens were smart they’d back him.