Black Lives Matter...

Can you believe how many of you idiots fell for BLM?

Now even Amazon is dropping them as a legitimate charity.

There is no end to how many things people like the lecturer got wrong.
 
I have to say this was a very interesting thread, from start to finish.

Especially starting around page 4 when the verdict in the Derek Chauvin case came in. There was such a sense of deflation, sadness and disappointment among the racist pricks and cunts (in today's world of gender fluid identities being one does not preclude the other) who post around here. Then briefly forlorn hope that the fact that a juror attended a march for racial justice wearing a BLM shirt would get the verdict tossed.

Chauvin himself pleaded guilty in the parallel federal civil rights case. Maybe he got tired of paying the lawyers. Or maybe he reflected and became a better man. Hope springs eternal.
 
Last edited:
What a shock the buffoon is on the side of the highly funded terrorist organization who is responsible for dozens of murders and billions in damages.

It's almost like he's been programmed to support the thing, and he supports the thing
 
nsacpi said:
I have to say this was a very interesting thread, from start to finish.

Especially starting around page 4 when the verdict in the Derek Chauvin case came in. There was such a sense of deflation, sadness and disappointment among the racist pricks and cunts (in today's world of gender fluid identities being one does not preclude the other) who post around here. Then briefly forlorn hope that the fact that a juror attended a march for racial justice wearing a BLM shirt would get the verdict tossed.

Chauvin himself pleaded guilty in the parallel federal civil rights case. Maybe he got tired of paying the lawyers. Or maybe he reflected and became a better man. Hope springs eternal.
Click to expand...

Why wouldn't normal people be outraged?

The only reason this case got any play was the 'victim' (degenerate scumbag really) was black. If the dude was white you wouldn't have heard a peep out of it from the racists like you.
 
nsacpi said:
There was such a sense of deflation, sadness and disappointment among the racist pricks and cunts (in today's world of gender fluid identities being one does not preclude the other) who post around here.
Click to expand...

Or we thought that there was enough reasonable doubt with the amount of fentanyl and health problems Floyd had. Nah, it couldn't be that.
 
nsacpi said:
Not a hard case. The jury just had to believe its eyes. Chauvin's body language and arrogance are there for all to see. It is stunning to think he had so much of a sense of impunity that he didn't mind all the videographers. He was going to show everyone he was the bossman. The same pride and arrogance that led him to kill will also lead to his being convicted.
Click to expand...

zitothebrave said:
I would vote guilty because he is guilty.
Click to expand...

sturg33 said:
Imagine living in that ****hole city
Click to expand...

Krgrecw said:
No matter the verdict they’ll burn it down.
Click to expand...

mqt said:
Guilty on all charges.
Click to expand...

sturg33 said:
Intimidation works

The city will still burn.

This is not about justice
Click to expand...

it is what it is
 
The funny this is you know this loser scoured through dozens of threads for his gotcha moment and this was one he felt best helped him
 
nsacpi said:
of course not...if the racists get to determine the standards of proof it is gonna be hard to "prove"
Click to expand...

If a liberal gets to decide the standards of proof anybody who disagrees with him is a racist. You make it really hard for someone to like you, bud.
 
Jaw said:
Do arrests for breaking the law count as harassment? Have you seen numbers that show blacks are harassed during lawful behavior at a greater rate than whites?
Click to expand...

nsacpi said:
police pull black people over for no reason disproportionately...unless driving while black is a legitimate reason

also more likely to cuff them and throw them against a wall, etc, etc
Click to expand...

nsacpi said:
• Compliance by civilians doesn’t eliminate racial differences in police use of force. Black civilians who were recorded as compliant by police were 21% more likely to suffer police aggression than compliant whites. We also found that the benefits of compliance differed significantly by race. This was perhaps our most upsetting result, for two reasons: The inequity in spite of compliance clashed with the notion that the difference in police treatment of blacks and whites was a rational response to danger. And it complicates what we tell our kids: Compliance does make you less likely to endure a beat-down—but the benefit is larger if you are white.

https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/roland-fryer-in-the-wsj-what-the-data-say-about-police
Click to expand...

nsacpi said:
• There are large racial differences in police use of nonlethal force. My research team analyzed nearly five million police encounters from New York City. We found that when police reported the incidents, they were 53% more likely to use physical force on a black civilian than a white one. In a separate, nationally representative dataset asking civilians about their experiences with police, we found the use of physical force on blacks to be 350% as likely. This is true of every level of nonlethal force, from officers putting their hands on civilians to striking them with batons. We controlled for every variable available in myriad ways. That reduced the racial disparities by 66%, but blacks were still significantly more likely to endure police force.
Click to expand...

Jaw said:
Who determines whether the civilian was compliant?
Click to expand...

nsacpi said:
"recorded as compliant by police"
Click to expand...

after a certain point it stops making sense to present an argument
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top