Bountygate 2020

Kaitlan Collins
@kaitlancollins
· 59m
The White House says Trump has now been briefed on what

was in his daily written intelligence briefing back in February, per the NYT.
 
Kaitlan Collins
@kaitlancollins
· 59m
The White House says Trump has now been briefed on what

was in his daily written intelligence briefing back in February, per the NYT.

Well, at least we know how far behind he is. I expect him to come out talking about a pandemic on the rise in a month or two when he gets around to reading that report.
 
Bountygate is dead, folks.

Veterans Group Accuses Donald Trump Of Acting Like A Traitor

Not only did he know about this for months, but the people in the WH all know that he knew and they have another big lie that's not going away. The fact that he knew about the bounty and did nothing, means that he was complicit with Russia. Then he gave Russia gift after gift after gift. It's going to make for some great negative campaign ads and stump fodder for Ol' Joe.
 
https://www.dailywire.com/news/mult...cebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dwbrand

"“Over the past several days, the New York Times and other news outlets have reported on allegations regarding our troops in Afghanistan. While we do not normally discuss such matters, we constantly evaluate intelligence reports and brief the President as necessary,” National Security Advisor Robert C. O’Brien said in a statement. "Because the allegations in recent press articles have not been verified or substantiated by the Intelligence Community, President Trump had not been briefed on the items. Nevertheless, the Administration, including the National Security Council staff, have been preparing should the situation warrant action.”"

"Department of Defense (DOD) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) also put out statements on the matter, with the DOD saying that it has “no corroborating evidence to validate” the allegations in The New York Times’ report and ODNI saying that the leaks are criminal."
 
Last edited:
the cult saying this is over

there is literally no way this looks good for him

it doesn't matter the excuse

but to the cult, nothing matters if it involves their leader
 
https://www.dailywire.com/news/mult...cebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dwbrand

"“Over the past several days, the New York Times and other news outlets have reported on allegations regarding our troops in Afghanistan. While we do not normally discuss such matters, we constantly evaluate intelligence reports and brief the President as necessary,” National Security Advisor Robert C. O’Brien said in a statement. "Because the allegations in recent press articles have not been verified or substantiated by the Intelligence Community, President Trump had not been briefed on the items. Nevertheless, the Administration, including the National Security Council staff, have been preparing should the situation warrant action.”"

"Department of Defense (DOD) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) also put out statements on the matter, with the DOD saying that it has “no corroborating evidence to validate” the allegations in The New York Times’ report and ODNI saying that the leaks are criminal."

Vague denials that don't make sense. If there were "no corroborating evidence" there would never have been a report in the first place. How incompetent do you think the intelligence agencies are? Wait. Don't answer that.

This is not simply unfounded gossip.

1. Taliban fighters were captured over a year ago who claimed this was going on. 2. Apparently wire transfers between Russian and the Taliban has been discovered. 3. There is broad agreement within the intelligence community that something dubious is going on. 4. This report came after a months long investigation into whether this was really going on or not.

Anyway, I wonder how those families who lost loved ones feel. I wonder how other military people feel about T's inaction.
 
and why so many differing stories coming out of the WH and GOP.
Until of course, yesterday when they held an (R) only briefing.

Trumps press spokesperson herself has given at least 3 different versions.

I learned a long time ago , the practical reason to never lie is --- that way there is only one story you have to remember
...................

Here we are back to square one asking the same question of the Trump Administration
Why did they lie ?
 
Vague denials that don't make sense. If there were "no corroborating evidence" there would never have been a report in the first place. How incompetent do you think the intelligence agencies are? Wait. Don't answer that.

This is not simply unfounded gossip.

1. Taliban fighters were captured over a year ago who claimed this was going on. 2. Apparently wire transfers between Russian and the Taliban has been discovered. 3. There is broad agreement within the intelligence community that something dubious is going on. 4. This report came after a months long investigation into whether this was really going on or not.

Anyway, I wonder how those families who lost loved ones feel. I wonder how other military people feel about T's inaction.

Our Intel agencies flat out said that Trump was not briefed on this.
 
https://www.dailywire.com/news/mult...cebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dwbrand

"“Over the past several days, the New York Times and other news outlets have reported on allegations regarding our troops in Afghanistan. While we do not normally discuss such matters, we constantly evaluate intelligence reports and brief the President as necessary,” National Security Advisor Robert C. O’Brien said in a statement. "Because the allegations in recent press articles have not been verified or substantiated by the Intelligence Community, President Trump had not been briefed on the items. Nevertheless, the Administration, including the National Security Council staff, have been preparing should the situation warrant action.”"

"Department of Defense (DOD) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) also put out statements on the matter, with the DOD saying that it has “no corroborating evidence to validate” the allegations in The New York Times’ report and ODNI saying that the leaks are criminal."

So basically the guys Trump hired are saying it so you know... must be true... they wouldn’t be trying to protect him or anything
 
the cult saying this is over

there is literally no way this looks good for him

it doesn't matter the excuse

but to the cult, nothing matters if it involves their leader

You're an idiot. Our intel agencies just said that Trump was not briefed on this. What part of this do you not understand? It very well might be true but our intel haven't confirmed it yet. That's why Trump was not briefed on it.
 
Last edited:
No the agencies didn’t say that. Officials that lead the agencies and who were hired by Trump said that.

You have no proof of this allegation. Yeah, everybody is covering for him. Show me proof instead of pulling **** out of the air. Just face facts that you fell for fake news. The NYT is relying upon anonymous sources and blew another story once again.
 
Last edited:
Our Intel agencies flat out said that Trump was not briefed on this.

That's semantics, meaning he never read the brief, therefore was never briefed.

Why would you assume this story is untrue??? It fits completely with OO's other actions. He's been carrying Putin's water since before he took office.
 
That's semantics, meaning he never read the brief, therefore was never briefed.

Why would you assume this story is untrue??? It fits completely with OO's other actions. He's been carrying Putin's water since before he took office.

THE INTEL AGENCIES HAVE COME AND SAID HE WASN'T BRIEFED. You got fed fake news. Just accept it and move on.
 
Back
Top