Braves in talks with DBacks for Trevor Cahill

I admit to having some indigestion when I heard "prospects." But this is ok. A gamble with upside, and adds some depth to the rotation.
 
6 million give or take for a guy who had a league average FIP? Not bad for a rebuilding team. If he does return to form he could be flipped at the deadline or possibly extended if the team thinks they have fixed him. For a team rebuilding this move has negative implications imo.

I think there is close to zero percent chance he is here beyond 2015, even if he were to win the Cy Young.
 
Except we are paying 6 million for at best an average pitcher. We are rebuilding. Letting some team dump their bad contract off on is isnt a good way to rebuild. Makes no sense.

So we should pay 2 million for a significantly worse pitcher like Wandy or Stults to be our 5th starter? That makes more sense?
 
Not a terrible deal, but not sure I really understand the point of it. 6 mil for a 4 era in a rebuilding year isn't bad. But, why not just give some young guys a shot instead of Wandy, Stults, Cahill?

He has a career 4.07 ERA and 4.28 FIP. His 2010 season everyone praises was a 4.19 FIP. Last year when everyone was down on him, it was 3.89. That's pretty much what he is, ~4 era

Why start their clock in a year we are destined to be terrible?
 
Aren't you the same person who said Gavin Floyd would get 10-12 million this season?

Pretty sure I never said that especially after he got hurt in the middle of the season. That said if Floyd had managed to stay healthy and continued pitching as he was likely would have gotten a 8-10 per deal.
 
Cahill. Harang has facial hair, anyway.

Unbelievably, Harang wins that game:

8433698.jpg
 
Then on the other hand, why waste money in a year destined to be terrible? There were already 5 starters on the squad

It's not like the unused money for 2015 gets added to future payrolls. The money is there to spend, why not spend it? Especially when it's a 1 year deal before his free agency and you're paying less than 6 million for his services?
 
I like this deal. Cahill is a low risk guy with the potential to catch lightning in a bottle. Elander is already 23 and seems stuck in A ball. Add in the draft pick and we could win big on this move.
 
I don't think anybody knows what Hart is trying to do anymore.

I don't. If you're developing young talent for 2017, develop it. Don't trade for a $6m tomato can and let him eat innings that Martin or several others could use to develop. If we needed to round out the back end of our rotation in order to contend, you might take a flyer on somebody like this.

But that's not where we're at and even if we were, this isn't the guy.

He doesn't throw strikes, he doesn't have repeatable mechanics, he's very out of shape and, in my opinion, he's not very bright. If there's no clear upside - and between him, Wandy, and Stoltz, there's not - why burn the $5.5m?

Another goofy 3 Johns move that they'll claim as genius. It's like a rebuild with a Goodwill placekeeper.
 
Practically every move he's made since becoming GM has been met with confusion and derision on the board.

With good reason. This is yet another head scratcher. Cmon, you're not competing this year. You should have spent this, KJ, Grilli, Callaspo and a few others' money and bought Olivera or Moncada. Or another wing in the Dominican Academy.

This front office hasn't steered a clear heading. I don't know what they're trying to do. If it's win, they're not going to do that with Trevor Cahill.
 
With good reason. This is yet another head scratcher. Cmon, you're not competing this year. You should have spent this, KJ, Grilli, Callaspo and a few others' money and bought Olivera or Moncada. Or another wing in the Dominican Academy.

This front office hasn't steered a clear heading. I don't know what they're trying to do. If it's win, they're not going to do that with Trevor Cahill.

Or used it to sign Heyward.
 
Back
Top