BRule
<B>BBQ Lead Hostess</B>
I'm taking your side guys. I'm making fun of thethe's argument that 44 million for those numbers is a fantastic bargain.
I know, I was just quoting to quote.
I'm taking your side guys. I'm making fun of thethe's argument that 44 million for those numbers is a fantastic bargain.
I'm taking your side guys. I'm making fun of thethe's argument that 44 million for those numbers is a fantastic bargain.
You realize I was playing the small sample game at the time right?
RESULTS ARE IN!:
Mets win the East.
Braves 2nd.
Nationals suck.
Heyward is worse than Garrett Anderson.
Markakis has an ISOSLG of .023 lollllllll
Unless you think he's going to hit 380 this year, I'd say your tune is going to be different in a month.
He's also been a negative in the field
For those of us who actually have a small sample, calling it a "game" is trivializing and hurtful.
Keep up the good work Trevor
It makes sense that they knew something was wrong with Cahill when they got him, and they're trying to fix it. They might fail but we lost pretty much nothing, so whatever.
He looks really good for stretches.
The announcing crew was saying he would lose his release point or arm slot from inning to inning and struggled staying consistent with it in ARZ. I don't remember which one, but it makes sense with the runs of good work and then extreme blow ups we have seen.
Cahill is more or less a sunk cost. Braves will probably wind up cutting him if he doesn't improve. He is averaging just over 4 IP per start, walking more guys than striking out, giving up more liners than at any point in his career, I guess you can say it's a good thing he's not giving up homers. But how much crap can you take. He's not cutting it on so many levels. When we get guys back or start promoting from the minors he's second on the block behind Stults. Though I think we'll move Stults to the pen, that's just a guess though.
Cahill is more or less a sunk cost. Braves will probably wind up cutting him if he doesn't improve. He is averaging just over 4 IP per start, walking more guys than striking out, giving up more liners than at any point in his career, I guess you can say it's a good thing he's not giving up homers. But how much crap can you take. He's not cutting it on so many levels. When we get guys back or start promoting from the minors he's second on the block behind Stults. Though I think we'll move Stults to the pen, that's just a guess though.
I have got to think Wisler, and perhaps even Martin are in the rotation by mid-summer. Cahill and Stults were worth a look to see if they could bounce back. Nothing lost but a few games while finding out who they are at this point in their careers.
I'm not sure our bullpen can afford to lose Martin. Sadly, we have so little that's working I'd be afraid to change one of the few things that is.
But Cahill's replacement has to be something they're working on.
I imagine his replacement will be Wisler if they can't figure out what's wrong and help him make adjustments.