BedellBrave
It's OVER 5,000!
Why do statheads make threads suck? They are like Ron Paul libertarians. 

That's the going rate for really good players.
Not at all. You're being a luddite here.
Of course, but as i said, if Taveras didnt die, they dont trade for him and who knows where Jason would have gone instead.
I think he goes up a million every 20 times you mention it. I remember when the trade first happened he was a 20 million dollar player.
Why do statheads make threads suck? They are like Ron Paul libertarians.![]()
And I am continually surprised at how much average players are getting. Baseball is doing very well for itself right now.
I've alalways said Heyward would be a mid 20 player. I wanted to sign him for 20 per year and I'm sure my record will back that up.
You keep it up and the guy will get 35 million per.![]()
I'm sorry, you just cannot value something with that many variables in a statistical model that will draw correlation factors to wins with any reliability. Not with the technology that exists today.
That's Trout and Markakis money.
Shoot, $44M for Markakis is a bargain, considering it would only get you one year of Jason Heyward.
Heyward will be the first time I'm going to watch a stream of another team just to watch him play.
Shoot, $44M for Markakis is a bargain, considering it would only get you one year of Jason Heyward.
I'm not sure what you exact point is but I will assume it is something different from
1) We can't measure defense well so we should only look at offensive statistics in choosing our hitters
2) Advanced metrics are no better than naive metrics such as errors, so franchises that just use the naive metrics will have just as much success as those who use advanced defensive metrics
You have to hand it to Markakis. He told the Braves they could have him for 4/44, 5/44, or 6/44, but Hart didn't want to make the mistake of keeping him too long so he refused to go beyond 4 years.
That's the going rate for really good players.
That's the going rate for really good players.