They lavished big contracts on 30something players like Lee, Thomas, Papelbon, Rollins, Utley and Halladay. Those guys were significantly older than the ones we moved this off-season. Significant difference imo. We had the chance to keep one more relatively young hitter as part of our core. We're going to have to spend at some point for a power bat at third or corner outfield.
One, you don't know how good a chance we really had. Two, the FO obviously had a much better handle on this. The moves we made may signify what our chances were. Three, while I was all aboard the Heyward train and was ticked when we traded him, the longer he goes, the more he simply proves he's not worth a huge contract.
And four, arguing whether we could have re-signed Upton or Heyward and taken a slightly different approach is a reasonable argument. I would argue that if you're going to go one route, then go all-out, which is mostly what we did. But at least there is an argument there.
I do not think arguing that we should have avoided replenishing the farm system is a reasonable argument. Niners is arguing for the Phillies model. That's my issue with his argument.